Re: Using OpenSSL, pipsecd...

1999-11-09 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Brian Nelson wrote: > I have a couple questions about pipsecd and OpenSSL on FreeBSD... I > cannot find a pipsecd document or anything, so I am mailing you, hoping > to find answers. Why not mail the author? :-) Cthulhu for President! For when you're tired of choosing

VC6 - conflict with objidl.h

1999-11-09 Thread Vincent Levesque
Hi,   I'm trying to compile some code under Visual C++ v6 and I get the following error messages:   C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\VC98\INCLUDE\objidl.h(786) : error C2059: syntax error : '('C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\VC98\INCLUDE\objidl.h(786) : error C2501: 'CRYPTO_

Using OpenSSL, pipsecd...

1999-11-09 Thread Brian Nelson
I have a couple questions about pipsecd and OpenSSL on FreeBSD... I cannot find a pipsecd document or anything, so I am mailing you, hoping to find answers. 1) Is there a good document that covers OpenSSL usage? I found openssl.org's documentation section to be rather... lacking... 2) What kin

Re: Jesus and SSL

1999-11-09 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
[ Note that this goes to the list. I'm not really trying to create a flamewar, but rather to get some constructive ideas and results ] sjsobol> > (a) The list is purposefully wide open, as noted on sjsobol> > http://www.openssl.org/support/. I believe the reason sjsobol> > would be a

Re: I can't import the certificate into my IIS

1999-11-09 Thread Newton Nyante
I had the same problem. I generated a key and csr wih openssl cna got a crt from verisign. After trying everything to get IIS so take it, I found out that for some reason keys need to be generated in IIS for it to use them. Anyone know otherwise? -Newton - Original Message - From: M

remove it from the store of CA?

1999-11-09 Thread kouichi matsumoto
How do you do? My name is Matsumoto. Japanese. Because it is poor at English, though it may be hard to read Forgive it, please. Im using openssl 0.9.2. Thank you. Teach though there are some questions, please. 1. Though it was started, proof to the certificate was lengthened more than the mistak

Re: Jesus and SSL

1999-11-09 Thread Frank Johnson
Just for the record. The blank email was sent accidently. One of those "few" times when my windoze machine went on the fritz. I was totally unaware that the message was sent and am embarrassed by the first time appearing on this list I am being called a spammer. I am now going back to lurking.

Re: Jesus and SSL

1999-11-09 Thread Steve Sobol
> > > (a) The list is purposefully wide open, as noted on > http://www.openssl.org/support/. I believe the reason would be a > concept called "service". I'm not going to get into a holy war about whether the list should be open or not. I'm just irritated that there is apparently no way t

remove it from the store of CA?

1999-11-09 Thread kouichi matsumoto
How do you do? My name is Matsumoto. Japanese. Because it is poor at English, though it may be hard to read Forgive it, please. Im using openssl 0.9.2. Thank you. Teach though there are some questions, please. 1. Though it was started, proof to the certificate was lengthened more than the mistak

Re: Jesus and SSL

1999-11-09 Thread Theodore Hope
> "In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate." Of course, because no CA would sign the Big Guy's cert. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org User Support Mailing List

Re: Mapping Certs to local account names: is there a standard practice?

1999-11-09 Thread Franco Papacella
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Jeffrey Altman wrote: [...] > > What I was hoping to determine from this thread was whether or not by > using a verified cert one could determine in a trusted manner who the > user is. It sounds to me like the answer to that is 'no'. That if a > user wants to use a Verisign

Re: Jesus and SSL

1999-11-09 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
sjsobol> No, this was a genuine spam sent because (a) the list is wide sjsobol> open and (b) doesn't appear to have anyone running it. sjsobol> sjsobol> (still.) (a) The list is purposefully wide open, as noted on http://www.openssl.org/support/. I believe the reason would be a concept