> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kaur Virunurm
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 1999 09:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: signed and certified but not for email
>
> Won't the certificate usage in IE also depend on the KEY
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dr Stephen Henson
> Sent: Thursday, September 23, 1999 01:13 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: signed and certified but not for email
>
>
> Samuel Liddicott wrote:
> > But the problem is that
my question was really what options are available as part of #3 for things
like stunnel, or a SSL capable version of lynx or wget (command line way
to retreive a web page), or even just a SSL capable version of telnet.
David Lang
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> David Lang <[EMAIL PR
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> > xenroll control has KeySpec property that you can specity
> > before CreatePKCS10():
> > xenroll.KeySpec = 1 ' AT_KEYEXCHANGE
> > xenroll.KeySpec = 2 ' AT_SIGNATURE
> >
>
> Interesting. Anyone know the attribute syntax and OID used to
David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> This is getting slightly off-topic, but without risking it what options do
> US companies have for items such as the SSLwrapper that was mentioned, or
> other similar items.
Option 1: Wait a year to let the patent expire.
Option 2: Use only DSA-based ciphers ("
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 09:04:02PM +0200, Jan Meijer wrote:
> We're planning on using stunnel in a production environment, but only if we
> can somehow verify how trustworthy it is. We could perform a
> source-code-review, but perhaps it's fully trusted by you all?
Trustworthy in what sense? T
Hi,
We're planning on using stunnel in a production environment, but only if we
can somehow verify how trustworthy it is. We could perform a
source-code-review, but perhaps it's fully trusted by you all?
Jan
--
alive=true
__
O
I have successfully installed Net::SSLeay on the picky NT machine now. Here
is the last fix I had to make to get it to compile (in addition to the
others posted previously for NT).
nmake error:
SSLeay.c(2508) : error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'const char *' to
'char *'
Conversion
This is getting slightly off-topic, but without risking it what options do
US companies have for items such as the SSLwrapper that was mentioned, or
other similar items.
David Lang
On Wed, 22 Sep 1999, Terrell Larson wrote:
> Aaron,
>
> In your situation I would not risk it either - I agree t
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 03:17:32PM +0200, Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
> In OpenSSL 0.9.3a I get the folowing handshake error:
> (WindowsNT)
>
>
> SSL_connct: 11 to Host before/connect initialization
> SSL_connct: 11 to Host SSLv3 write client hello A
> SSL_read : 11 to Host SSL3 alert fatal:hands
On Thu, Sep 23, 1999 at 05:01:38AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am trying to install openssl-0.9.4
> and When I type ./config
> I get the following message at the end.
> ---start message
> " Reconfigure the source tree (via './config' or 'perl Configure'), Please.
>
=?UTF-8?B?UmnEjWFyZGFzIMSMZXBhcw==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> --ibTvN161/egqYuK8
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Tue Sep 21 13:38:24 1999 +
>(Antradienis, 1999 m. rugs=C4=97jo 21 d. 15:38:24 CEST),
> Sampo Kell
Aumont - Comite Reseaux des Universites <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In order to introduce s/mime authentication in the mailling list
> robot sympa (http://listes.cru.fr/sympa ), I'am looking for a library
> to check s/mime signature.
Although my tutorial currently only covers producing signatu
Hallo,
In OpenSSL 0.9.3a I get the folowing handshake error:
(WindowsNT)
SSL_connct: 11 to Host before/connect initialization
SSL_connct: 11 to Host SSLv3 write client hello A
SSL_read : 11 to Host SSL3 alert fatal:handshake failure
165:error:14094410:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:sslv3 alert
> xenroll control has KeySpec property that you can specity
> before CreatePKCS10():
> xenroll.KeySpec = 1 ' AT_KEYEXCHANGE
> xenroll.KeySpec = 2 ' AT_SIGNATURE
>
Interesting. Anyone know the attribute syntax and OID used to carry this
information in the ge
At 03:48 PM 9/22/99 -0500, Matthew M. Copeland wrote:
>
>Does anyone know of a common lisp interface to the OpenSSL library?
Yeah, there's "OpenEth-Eth-Ell"...
sorry, couldn't resist...
--
+---+---+
| Dan O'Reilly
The SSL protocol definition itself sets the 16k limit...
So u have to split the data.
-Anshuman Kanetkar
David Murphy wrote:
Hi - we are trying to send various lengths
of application data to OpenSSL server from a Java client and find that
lengths above ~16K cause :- SSL_Routines:SSL3_GET_REC
I am trying to install
openssl-0.9.4
and When I type ./config
I get the following message at the
end.
---start
message
" Reconfigure the
source tree (via './config' or 'perl Configure'), Please.
make: *** [Makefile.ssl] Error 1
---end message
Hi,
I ported OpenSSL to another RTOS "OSE" from Enea OSE Systems but
do not have windows CE :(
/Lennart
xuyifeng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need openssl support for WindowsCE, is there anyone working on this porting?
>
> Regards,
> XuYifeng
>
>
> ___
> > But the problem is that certificates, CA-signed and installed are marked in
> > IE5 as fit for everything EXCEPT email and client-identification.
> >
> > They are marked for servers, code signing, encryped file systems, all kinds
> > of stuff I have never heard of!
Won't the certificate usage
20 matches
Mail list logo
