Compile problems

1999-07-19 Thread hUnTeR
Dear list readers: I am trying to build openssl-0.9.3a on a RedHat 5.2 Linux 2.0.36 server and receiving a critical error, as follows: ~/temp/openssl-0.9.3a/ ./config --prefix=/usr/local --openssldir=/usr/local/open ssl Operating system: i686-whatever-linux2 Configuring for linux-elf IsWindows=0

Re: Format of PEM RSA Private Key

1999-07-19 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
Keith Johnston wrote: > > The encrypted format of the RSA private key looks like this: > > -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY- > Proc-Type: 4,ENCRYPTED > DEK-Info: DES-EDE3-CBC,EBC485A7EC86234E > > DaJXL3PFfg4tFWi1hM1aLrbtTMWHLUHFC0u+eKf/Mp/As9TqGtb6hZeULTIcje82 > bIb5U3O53W9l248x9vr2Zw3ACI7HLG7tMz

Re: Passing user data to password callbacks

1999-07-19 Thread Damien Miller
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > Bodo_Moeller> So, is backwards compatibility an important issue here > Bodo_Moeller> and is it worth this kind of evil hack, or should we > Bodo_Moeller> just add the parameters? > > Backward compatibility is an important issue. Think

Open SSL error and PEM pass phrase scripting

1999-07-19 Thread Scott Liebergen
Hi, I sent this ou the other day to the mod-ssl list, but I have not heard anything So I am going to post it here. I think this is the right list, but if it is not, could someone please direct me in the right direction. Thanks My problem: I am running Apache with mod_ssl in conjunction with mod

Re: Passing user data to password callbacks

1999-07-19 Thread Damien Miller
On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, Bodo Moeller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 01:20:52AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > >> So, is backwards compatibility an important issue here > >> and is it worth this kind of evil hack, or should we > >> just add the parameters? > > > Backward compatib

Re: Passing user data to password callbacks

1999-07-19 Thread Bodo Moeller
On Tue, Jul 20, 1999 at 01:20:52AM +0200, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: >> So, is backwards compatibility an important issue here >> and is it worth this kind of evil hack, or should we >> just add the parameters? > Backward compatibility is an important issue. Think "dynamic > library".

Re: Little select() trick

1999-07-19 Thread Bodo Moeller
Juan Carlos Castro y Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Maybe it's obvious but I'd like know if it's possible before I actually > start working. Let's say I have on one corner an SSL "socket", > handshaking already done. On the other corner, I have a normal, > connected, TCP socket. I'd like to know w

Re: certificate problem :-( please help

1999-07-19 Thread Orion T. Robillard
I just had the same problem today. I fixed it but I dont know exactly what I did that made it work. I checked the hostname -f and it gave me an alias at first, try hostname -vf and lookfor h_name=`...'. Even if your using a vhost you should use your regular host name in the csr. Good Luck! Barry

Re: Passing user data to password callbacks

1999-07-19 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
Bodo_Moeller> > Please find attached a patch against openssl-SNAP-19990718 Bodo_Moeller> > which modifies the pem/* stuff to take an extra Bodo_Moeller> > argument of type void* to all the functions which use Bodo_Moeller> > a password callback. It also modifies the apps/* to Bodo_Moeller> > use t