Radovan Semancik schrieb:
>
>
> Here, server cert:
>
> > > Validity
> > > Not Before: Jul 13 14:36:12 1999 GMT
> > > Not After : Jul 12 14:36:12 2000 GMT
>
> But the problem is solved. But don't ask me how I have done it :-)))
> (maybe the -msie_hack option to c
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am trying to create a secure scriptible client in perl, and thought
net-ssleay would be the best choice. I am developing under nt (not my own
choice) but it shouldn't matter. I have been trying to get server
certificate verification to work, but the documentation states that the
examples provide
Are there any references on how to use the DSA crypto suite?
Outside of SSL, I need to sign a SHA1 hash with a private PEM key and
verify the signature based on a public key in an x509 cert.
Thanks for any help,
Marc Mosko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Rod Farmer schrieb:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have just untarred openssl in the /usr/loca directory on my box
So you have a /usr/local/openssl-0.9.3a directory then?
> and am trying desperately to install openssl with the make command.
>
> I have tried cc, gcc and linux-elf configuration
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> What are the validity dates for the Issuer i.e.
> Issuer: C=SK, L=Bratislava, O=Business Global Systems,
> CN=Identity root Certificate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> compare the dates with the Server cert validity..
> Server cert validity has to be within the issuer cert val
Hi everyone,
I have just untarred openssl in the /usr/loca directory on my box
and am trying desperately to install openssl with the make command.
I have tried cc, gcc and linux-elf configurations with make and pmake.
All of them exit when they can't find crpytlib.o. Also it tells me t
Thanks Ulf, Steve and everyone else,
Wrong value for iqmp was the cause of the problem!!
I found the source of my problems too.
Thanks
Hemant
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Supp
Erwann ABALEA wrote:
>
> On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Radovan Semancik wrote:
>
> > I have problem with OpenSSL generated certificates. MSIE 4 and MSIE 5
> > both say that this certificate has expored:
> [..]
> - the server/client certificate has a notAfterDate that falls AFTER the
>CA's one... It'
What are the validity dates for the Issuer i.e.
Issuer: C=SK, L=Bratislava, O=Business Global Systems,
CN=Identity root Certificate [EMAIL PROTECTED]
compare the dates with the Server cert validity..
Server cert validity has to be within the issuer cert validity..
;>
> Hello!
>
> I have probl
HAHAHAHAHA! Y2K bug on Win98!!! I had this one too.
Radovan Semancik wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have problem with OpenSSL generated certificates. MSIE 4 and MSIE 5
> both say that this certificate has expored:
>
> Validity
> Not Before: Jul 13 14:36:12 1999 GMT
> Not A
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Radovan Semancik wrote:
> I have problem with OpenSSL generated certificates. MSIE 4 and MSIE 5
> both say that this certificate has expored:
2 possible answers:
- the certificate is not valid yet (for MSIE). To check this, change the
date to the future, and display the
At 17:49 13.07.99 +0200, Radovan Semancik wrote:
>Hello!
Hello,
>I have problem with OpenSSL generated certificates. MSIE 4 and MSIE 5
>both say that this certificate has expored:
What is the validity period of the issuer cert ?
The subject validity period must be in the validity period of the
Hello!
I have problem with OpenSSL generated certificates. MSIE 4 and MSIE 5
both say that this certificate has expored:
Certificate:
Data:
Version: 3 (0x2)
Serial Number: 2 (0x2)
Signature Algorithm: md5WithRSAEncryption
Issuer: C=SK, L=Bratislava, O=Business
Hi all,
I use the MS S/MIME engine in Outlok 2000 to sign my messages in detached
mode. The certificate/key was generated with my own PKI server;
the certificate has all the standard PKI extensions and has a
chain length of 3.
Problem? When I send my message to friends in the same LAN
(i
> You can use the RSAref library kit inside the US for non-commercial use, but
> good luck finding it, RSA pulled it off their website a few months ago.
look on replay.com, it's there (both versions).
--
"A computer system without Microsoft products is
like a dog without bricks ch
Now I have checked with HP and it is the same processortypes in the
different HP machines ( They do not differ in instructions inside the CPU ).
They are supposed to handle large numbers in the same way. The slower
machine has actually a faster processor 64 MHz vs. 48 MHz.
Earlier I used a bin
Benjamin Rosenbaum wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In the instructions for configuring mod_ssl for win32,
> the ones at
> http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/INSTALL.Win32 ,
> it says you have to modify line 174 of crypto\bn\bn_mulw.c in the
> OpenSSL source.
>
>
> Is the doc wrong? Is
Damien Miller wrote:
>
> My brain is being slowly roasted trying to grok the profusion of ASN1
> string encodings.
>
> I am trying to write a small C app that generates and signs
> certificate requests, but I am having trouble finding which encoding
> to use. The PKIX RFC recommends UTF8Strings,
Patrick Harlin schrieb:
>
> One Strange thing though is that when I ran openssl for the first time I got
> something saying "Unable to get random, try to use option -rand". But after
> I used "make test" this behavour vanished ???
Thsi is normal behaviour. OpenSSL creates a randseed file
in wh
Now I have checked with HP and it is the same processortypes in the
different HP machines ( They do not differ in instructions inside the CPU ).
They are supposed to handle large numbers in the same way. The slower
machine has actually a faster processor 64 MHz vs. 48 MHz.
Earlier I used a bin
My brain is being slowly roasted trying to grok the profusion of ASN1
string encodings.
I am trying to write a small C app that generates and signs
certificate requests, but I am having trouble finding which encoding
to use. The PKIX RFC recommends UTF8Strings, but allows the
following:
>
One Strange thing though is that when I ran openssl for the first time I got
something saying "Unable to get random, try to use option -rand". But after
I used "make test" this behavour vanished ??? But it is stil very slow
generating the private keys
/Patrick
__
23 matches
Mail list logo