>cc -I../crypto -I../include -O -DNOPROTO -c s2_meth.c -o s2_meth.o
>In file included from ssl_locl.h:75,
> from s2_meth.c:61:
>../include/err.h:230: warning: parameter names (without types) in
function declaration
>cc -I../crypto -I../include -O -DNOPROTO -c s2_srvr.c -o s2_sr
I am new to SSL and in trying to create my first certificate request, I am
having a problem.
Here is the configuration. I have downloaded and compiled openssl (v0.9.1c)
on Windows NT 4 with MS VC++ 6.0. I am ultimately trying create a secure
Web server using Openssl, mod_ssl and Apache 1.3.4 on W
> I'm not sure I like this, because you have no strong assurance that
> you've successfully eliminated RSA everywhere, and it also means that
> programs that use OpenSSL can only be certified RSA-clean with runtime
> testing.
>
> I agree that #iffing the entire source file is the way to go, thou
Jeffrey Altman wrote:
>
> > Frank O'Dwyer wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
> > > script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
> > > specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places
> Frank O'Dwyer wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
> > script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
> > specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places. Are
> > there any other flags I nee
Frank O'Dwyer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
> script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
> specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places. Are
> there any other flags I need to add?
>
It
Actually, doesn't a 302 redirect cause problems with browsers?
Our experience has been that the browser pops up a warning
messaging indicating that the site the user wants to visit
is not the one actually being visited.
Ulrich Kroener wrote:
>
> One way to do it is to use the good old HTTP 3xx m
Hi,
Is it still possible to build OpenSSL without RSA support? The configure
script doesn't mention -DNO_RSA as an option, and when I went ahead and
specified it anyway, the build was broken in a number of places. Are
there any other flags I need to add?
Cheers,
Frank O'Dwyer.
__
One way to do it is to use the good old HTTP 3xx message.
See the HTTP specs at w3.org or at
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2068/rfc2068
regarding
10.3.3 302 Moved Temporarily
Ulrich
---Juergen Rensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if I understand, how would you do a re-
I'm somewhat surprised that you get as far as you indicate - "-quiet"
is modifying the behaviour somewhat. When you run s_client without
it, it will always terminate before getting the http response.
This is because s_client is designed to terminate whenever it
gets an EOF on stdin. When you pipe
I am new to SSL, and need to build an application talking to another host
on top of SSLv3.
I've installed SSLeay 0.9.0b on my FreeBSD unix server, installed Apache
mod_ssl, obtained and installed the Verisign Certificate, and done some
initial testing. So far so good.
I planned on using s_client
I'm not sure if I understand, how would you do a re-direct?
Juergen
-Original Message-
From: Goetz Babin-Ebell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 12, 1999 9:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Server cert or site cert ?
At 12:33 12.03.99 +1300, you wrote:
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
>
> At 12:33 12.03.99 +1300, you wrote:
> >Yes, I forgot. But then you would have to type that (URL+port) into your
> browser, right?
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Goetz Babin-Ebell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> >https://www.company_a.com:1443/secure_page.ht
At 12:33 12.03.99 +1300, you wrote:
>Yes, I forgot. But then you would have to type that (URL+port) into your
browser, right?
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Goetz Babin-Ebell [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>https://www.company_a.com:1443/secure_page.html
>https://www.company_b.com:2443/secure_pa
Buchs Christian writes:
>
> > > Do you support (or plan to support) also SSLeay-0.9.0b or OpenSSL ?
> >
> >
> > It builds and works fine with SSLeay-0.9.0b and openssl-0.9.1c without
> > changes. (just tested)
>
> Not under NT unfortunately...
You're right. I'm just writing a fix.. s
15 matches
Mail list logo