>I've just succeded in compiling the libcrypto.a and libssl.a in
>openssl-0.9.1c using the GNU egcs compiler on Windows NT (mingw32). I
>want to use this to fetch https webpages.
>
>I looked through the demos to find one that could help me get started.
>I found demos/ssl/cli.cpp, which seemed to d
Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 19, 1999 at 10:07:28AM +, Ben Laurie wrote:
> > Depends what you want to do. If you only want to do SSL, then just strip
> > out the ciphersuites you don't want to allow. Note that you'll have to
> > enable the "new" ciphersuites to get 1024/56, and furthe
Sorry for continuing this thread, but I just came
across:
http://www.securityfocus.com/templates/forum_message.html?forum=2&head=32&id
=32
which includes the following description of a Linux
crackin:
"Readers should also note how although a key binary in the cracked machine
had been modi
>
> >US is far away from OpenSSL, and will probably remain that way for
> >some time, unless the US export law changes radically.
>
>
> You mean next month (Dec 15, 1999).
>
U.S. law is not going to change radically on Dec. 15. There will
still be a one time review of exported binaries. Exp
Hi,
I'm a final year Computer Science student. I'm trying to use openssl to generate X.509
certificate in my program, but I couldn't found any API to do so. Does openssl have
any API for me to generate X.509 certificate in my C program?
Thanks.
Angus Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
___
Hi all,
I'm very new of OpenSSL and also very new of everything concerning
security and cryptography, so excuse me for everything (excuse also
my English).
I've installed OpenSSL 0.9.4 (Linux Slackware - kernel 2.2.12).
I've created a new CA using the CA.sh shell provided in the misc dir.
I've c
Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
>
> I need some help with making a US-export happy OpenSSL.
>
> So I had a phone call with the NSA here and asked them what I can
> get away with. Note that the conversation was specific to Apple, and
> not necessarily applicable to my fellow Americans, but I doubt t
Paul Khavkine wrote:
>
> As far as i know RHat is still using SSLeay.
> If it is it should work fine.
Even if they weren't, a cert is a cert - the only thing that might give
trouble is file formats.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there ar
Nicolas Roumiantzeff wrote:
>
> >US is far away from OpenSSL, and will probably remain that way for
> >some time, unless the US export law changes radically.
>
> You mean next month (Dec 15, 1999).
No. The theory is that there will be no change for source export.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.a
>US is far away from OpenSSL, and will probably remain that way for
>some time, unless the US export law changes radically.
You mean next month (Dec 15, 1999).
Nicolas Roumiantzeff.
__
OpenSSL Project
Fred wrote (talking about NSA):
> 56-bit DES is no problem.
> 56-bit restricted RSA is no problem.
> 3DES is not allowed.
> In general, they seemed to imply 56 bits of anything is no
>problem, but I'll have to double check that. Probably if there were
>such as thing as 128-bit rot13 is would
11 matches
Mail list logo