I don't like the name "opensource-dev". The old name, SLDev, fits just well
- it was about people getting together developing Second Life-related stuff.
Now what are we developing? "Open Source"? That's a slogan, it does not
manifest as anything, like an actual virtual world. Not to mention that,
s
P.S. Actually "viewer-dev" might be even better.
Kakurady (Geneko Nemeth)
2010/2/5 Kakurady Drakenar
> I don't like the name "opensource-dev". The old name, SLDev, fits just well
> - it was about people getting together developing Second Life-related stuff.
>
Yup that was about the in-world build tools all right. Nothing about
compiling it.
Kakurady (Geneko Nemeth)
2010/2/5 Colin Kern
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Paul Oppenheim (Poppy Linden)
> wrote:
> > It's still CMake, if that's what you're asking. I'm not on the viewer 2
> team, so I can'
