Re: [opensource-dev] FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy

d Mode viewer a couple of years ago? Are you saying he would not be welcome? Jesse Barnett ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy

to a single person project where the dev has been helping the community but is not forbidden under these rules. Jesse Barnett On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Jesse Barnett wrote: > Thank you for the hard work there Soft. It answers all of the questions I > have except for this s

Re: [opensource-dev] FAQ posted for Third Party Viewer Policy

lient that everyone else is being caught with. And by now everyone should know that I have taken a very strong stance against ripping and ripper clients and am not Neil. Jesse Barnett On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Tigro Spottystripes < tigrospottystri...@gmail.com> wrote: > --

Re: [opensource-dev] Known details of LL 'Firefly' client-side scripting

sandbox. Jesse Barnett On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > On 2010-03-17, at 16:55, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > > Somewhere along the line Argent, you trusted to install the SL > > binary and its "badly behaved code can compromise you." > > T

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

address listed. major fail, Jesse Barnett ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

Policy IS correct and is what will go into effect. You will still have to share real life contact info with Linden Labs but you can opt out of sharing that information with the entire world. (thanks for clearing that up Joe!) Jesse Barnett ___

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

the rose colored glasses and read it again as if YOU had to sign it, then you will begin to understand the considerable amount of unease that the community is experiencing at the moment. Jesse Barnett ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

Just some thoughts in passing Precedent has been set in cases that clickwrap agreements take precedence and supercede any conflicting statements in shrinkwrap agreements. Although it has not been stated, it is logical that Linden Labs will make the TPV pop up as a clickwrap agreem

Re: [opensource-dev] Third party viewer policy: commencement date

ity. As you yourself pointed out, the GPL is clearly written and easy to understand, the same can not be said for the TPV or we would not be having this conversation. with regards, Jesse Barnett ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] A note on preserving "NO WARRANTY" for SL TPV developers

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Marine Kelley wrote: > That's my opinion and that's why, so far, I am not quitting yet despite all > the fuss around the policy (that was for Jesse *winks*). > Thanks Marine! I am blaming it on alzheim

Re: [opensource-dev] Subject: Re: Can you legally agree to, incomprehensible conditions?

Actually reports in the forum stated that many had to agree to a completely blank box with no text inside. On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > > > > A question for anyone who uses the SL viewer with a different default > > language, or the LL staff who might know: Is the new T

Re: [opensource-dev] Can you legally agree to incomprehensible conditions

cellent blog post last month about dual licensing and contribution agreements that should be required reading for everyone: http://blog.robla.net/2010/thoughts-on-dual-licensing-and-contrib-agreements/ Jesse Barnett ___ Policies and (un)subscribe infor

Re: [opensource-dev] Introduction

You do realize that most us do not recognize Boston as being part of the US territories? j/k and welcome aboard Oz! On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:28 AM, Glen Canaday wrote: > Mornin, east-coaster! > > --GC > > ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information av

Re: [opensource-dev] Offlist replies + Posting Policies and Guidelines

I think you hit the nail on the head. Dzontas experiment gone wrong? Jesse Barnett On Sunday, August 8, 2010, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > All this non-sense looks and sounds furiously like the gibberish that some > so called "A.I." bots produce... > If I were you, guys, I'

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

good and gives more hope then any of the discussions so far. Jesse Barnett ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

wiki page: "This feature is an important step on our social media strategy that will ultimately allow you to connect your inworld identity to other social networks, on an opt-in basis. Again, Display Names and eventually, the connection to social networks, is all about choice." Jesse Bar

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

. Jesse Barnett ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

Here it is. Paisley mentions it in the introduction to her show tonight: Its 11.00pm here in Sydney Australia, and I’ve just been informed by > Communications Manager Arabella Steadham from the Emerald > Team who > is appearing on Tonight Live with Paisley > Beebe

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

Really wish that was true but you saw Katharine's comments in irc. Absolutely nothing has changed with Emerald except for the servers. Here is hoping that both Philip and legal are not deceived so easily. Jesse Barnett On Monday, August 23, 2010, Tateru Nino wrote: >  And now, perhaps