Re: [opensource-dev] Test Viewer

2011-01-26 Thread Harold Brown
The SSL errors for web profiles happens if you goto the my.secondlife.com site in a browser as well. On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 8:18 PM, Trilo Byte wrote: > Tried on Mac > STORM-236 Works great, though in build 219680 (mac client) there needs to be > a space between "Speak button" and "(Voice Enable

[opensource-dev] Beta Server Release Notes

2014-02-06 Thread Harold Brown
The Beta Server Release notes (Magnum, BlueSteel and LeTigre) have not been updated since early in January. And seeing as a new release was pushed it would be nice to see what those changes were. http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Beta/BlueSteel http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Beta/LeTigre http://wi

Re: [opensource-dev] Beta Server Release Notes

2014-02-07 Thread Harold Brown
gt; maestro > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) < > o...@lindenlab.com> wrote: > >> On 2014-02-06, 14:13 , Harold Brown wrote: >> >> The Beta Server Release notes (Magnum, BlueSteel and LeTigre) have not >> been updated sinc

Re: [opensource-dev] Avatar Hover Height feature

2015-02-03 Thread Harold Brown
The simple fact of the matter is. If you do not sign a code contribution agreement LL can NOT use your code. On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:05:20 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > > > On 2015-01-31 07:53 , Henri Beauchamp wrote: > > >

Re: [opensource-dev] [POLICY] Configurable HTTP user-agent string

2010-05-05 Thread Harold Brown
This question is someone being overly obtuse on purpose. The Internal Web Browser is 1. Not a Third Party Viewer, 2. Nor is it connecting to the Second Life Grid, negating the whole "Spoof" clause question At the most it might connect to an HTTP-Server on a prim. If the Internal Web Browser is

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-24 Thread Harold Brown
What I find interesting is that people are neglecting to realize that ANY viewer, even a LL viewer could have been used to do the same thing by changing the WEBPAGE the login screen pointed to. Or for that matter distributing a object using the new Media functions to load a webpage with the exact

Re: [opensource-dev] Blocking viewers.

2010-09-08 Thread Harold Brown
In regards to Phoenix vs Emerald. The ONLY things Phoenix removed from the client that made them TPV compliant was the EMKDU.dll file (as well as removing the ability to use the LLKDU.dll) The gist of this seeming to be that allowing a Third Party client the ability to use LLKDU.dll means that cl

Re: [opensource-dev] Blocking viewers.

2010-09-08 Thread Harold Brown
ANY Secondlife Viewer could be used for the exact same type of DDoS attack. Even more so the 2.0 viewers with Media on a Prim. The DDoS was from a webpage with hidden images being called from another site. Not from the clients being used as a Bot network. In this case it just happened to be the

Re: [opensource-dev] Lindens way ahead of us

2010-09-27 Thread Harold Brown
I doubt this is a personal build as this implements a new wearable "physics" item. From the cursory glance through the source changes this appears to allow for each Avatar to have their own personal breast physics setting. On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 11:11 PM, miss c wrote: > yep that's why I said

Re: [opensource-dev] O.O Display name code DROP!

2010-10-15 Thread Harold Brown
This is another change that a very small percentage of people wanted that was made without consideration to how it affects the larger community. The PROPER change should have been to add an OPTION to log to .llsd for those people making log files of Office Hours parsing log files for posting to th

Re: [opensource-dev] On Live, SL via Cloud Computing

2010-10-28 Thread Harold Brown
I have an OnLive Founders account, and it is actually pretty good for response time. The downside of it right now is the small game library and the fact that you have to use an XBOX360 controller if you want to use a joystick. On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Dale Innis wrote: > Has anyone on