On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Robin Cornelius wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Soft Linden wrote:
> > Mike's correct.
> >
> > If you see any wording that's ambiguous about that, let us know.
> > ___
>
>
> Well you seem to have spelled the
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 7:03 AM, Jonathan Irvin wrote:
> I do often hear complaints and wishes for new build tools, what about us
> LSL devs? Some things I would like are:
>
>1. Better IDE in SL Viewer
>2. API for compiling in LSL using various IDEs already available
>3. Going along w
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Morgaine wrote:
> Ambroff, adding a specialized interface just to support an IDE is a very
> bad idea.
I think in general you are right, I was mostly just throwing it out as a
half-baked thought. You still have to build a sane object model in the
viewer before a p
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> > - If you are going to contribute to Snowglobe, you will need to complete
> > the Second Life Viewer Contribution Agreement. While not everyone is
> > comfortable with it, we need to do it to protect our business interests.
> It
> > also pro
