---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/443/
---
Review request for Viewer and Richard Nelson.
Summary
---
Bug:
Setting
https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-26648 was created to
collect issues discovered while using v3.0.0 (238157).
1. should we keep using VWR-26648 now that a newer Beta is out ?
2. I reorganized linked items and now they're all "children of" VWR-26648.
It seems easier to read this way. Is this
On 2011-08-19 7:48, opensourceobscure wrote:
> https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-26648 was created to
> collect issues discovered while using v3.0.0 (238157).
>
> 1. should we keep using VWR-26648 now that a newer Beta is out ?
No need - issues can just be filed in VWR as usual.
> 2. I reor
On 2011-08-16 11:06, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
I have updated his script to work with current versions of Mercurial
(there was one minor api change), and added a feature of two of my
own. I've gotten approval to push this out to the public bitbucket,
and have documented it at:
htt
On 2011-08-19 9:37, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
Effective this morning, all of viewer-development passes these tests
and*all future merge requests are subject to them*.
I strongly urge anyone working on code that might be going to
viewer-development to install the hooks immediately (th
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/444/
---
Review request for Viewer and Richard Nelson.
Summary
---
In busy mode
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/443/#review983
---
Ship it!
good catch!
- Richard
On Aug. 19, 2011, 3:55 a.m., Va
