On 5/4/2011 1:01 AM, xinyi chen wrote:
> Actually, the autobuild.exe and autobuild.cmd has already put in
> D:\Python25\Scripts\
> I don't understand why the builder still says that it can't open file ...
>
> Let me know if anyone knew why.
>
>
> Thanks
> Simon
>
Try moving autobuild.cmd out of yo
Yup, the error - "can't open file autobuild is missing", how about the last
error -
CMake Error at cmake/Prebuilt.cmake:34 (message):
Failed to download or unpack prebuilt 'ogg-vorbis'. Process returned 2.
Call Stack (most recent call first):
cmake/Audio.cmake:11 (use_prebuilt_binary)
llaud
Please review, it covers this
https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Build_Viewer_With_Autobuild
You need to use the open source configurations instead, ie
autobuild build -c DebugOS
autobuild build -c RelWithDebInfoOS
autobuild build -c ReleaseOS
These will use publicly distributable libraries.
On 5
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/297/#review676
---
This change is identical to the one under review at
https://coder
> On May 4, 2011, 11:58 a.m., Boroondas Gupte wrote:
> > This change is identical to the one under review at
> > https://codereview.secondlife.com/r/289
> >
> > Did you upload the wrong diff file to one of the review requests?
Oops, yes I did. We can ignore this one and I'll rename the other
> On May 4, 2011, 11:58 a.m., Boroondas Gupte wrote:
> > This change is identical to the one under review at
> > https://codereview.secondlife.com/r/289
> >
> > Did you upload the wrong diff file to one of the review requests?
>
> Brad Kittenbrink wrote:
> Oops, yes I did. We can ignore t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/289/
---
(Updated May 4, 2011, 2:57 p.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
-
> On May 4, 2011, 11:58 a.m., Boroondas Gupte wrote:
> > This change is identical to the one under review at
> > https://codereview.secondlife.com/r/289
> >
> > Did you upload the wrong diff file to one of the review requests?
>
> Brad Kittenbrink wrote:
> Oops, yes I did. We can ignore t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/299/
---
Review request for Viewer.
Summary
---
Fix for error using precompiled
Using that will create a build # of zero (i.e. 2.6.8.0) not the actual build
#. Is there a was to poke the build # into the script like Firestorms
./build_firestorm_linux.sh --version ?
On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Kadah wrote:
> Please review, it covers this
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/300/
---
Review request for Viewer.
Summary
---
The use_prebuilt_binary macro h
On 2011-05-04 18:57, Mysty Saunders wrote:
> Using that will create a build # of zero (i.e. 2.6.8.0) not the actual
> build #. Is there a was to poke the build # into the script like
> Firestorms ./build_firestorm_linux.sh --version ?
Not yet... there is some work needed on the version generati
Sprint 15, ends 05.16.11
Wednesday, May 4 General Notes
--
- Happy Star Wars day. May the 4th be with you.
- "Daily" in the title refers to the frequency of our scrum stand-ups.
Not the summaries.
Team Status
--
Oz Linden
-
13 matches
Mail list logo
