I would like some other people who are helping test autobuild to
verify if the compile-time setting LL_RELEASE_FOR_DOWNLOAD is not set
to TRUE, especially if you are building on a different os/platform
than I am.
This seems to be the case for me in Win XP + VS2005 Express. I added
my own conditi
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/148/
---
Review request for Viewer.
Summary
---
Rather than relying on (probabl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/148/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2011, 6:07 a.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
---
Failing the windows build. it refuses to stay connected and I'm not having this
issue with any other build. I can't even tell from the logs whats disconnecting
it...
> To: viewer-development-bui...@lists.secondlife.com
> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 10:04:37 -0800
> From: viewer-development-bui...@l
Slightly off topic, but I have a region performance question:
>From an in-sim usage standpoint, and say 2-20 messages per second prospect
What are the pro and cons of llRegionSay() vs. HTTP-In in terms of
resources?
(aside from the known pro and cons of the function itself as stated on the
wiki)
Ar
> On Feb. 8, 2011, 9:37 a.m., Alain Linden wrote:
> > I'm not sure AUTOBUILD_CONFIGURATION is a good name for this environment
> > variable. I know this is long, but AUTOUBUILD_DEFAULT_BUILD_CONFIGURATIONS
> > is more accurate and descriptive (and one could probably drop the AUTOBUILD
> > if
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/141/#review355
---
Ship it!
- Jenn
On Feb. 6, 2011, 8:01 p.m., Oz Linden wrote:
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/140/#review356
---
Ship it!
- Jenn
On Feb. 6, 2011, 5:39 p.m., Oz Linden wrote:
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/129/
---
(Updated Feb. 11, 2011, 6:23 p.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
---