[opensource-dev] Ohai!

I don't recall signing up for this list, but I'm happy to be here. If nobody else takes credit, I'll blame robla. I haven't done anything with SL in a while... busy with school and work. Speaking of school, I'm attending classes with a focus on computational linguistics. There has been some dis

[opensource-dev] What's with the rename?

I don't like the name "opensource-dev". The old name, SLDev, fits just well - it was about people getting together developing Second Life-related stuff. Now what are we developing? "Open Source"? That's a slogan, it does not manifest as anything, like an actual virtual world. Not to mention that, s

Re: [opensource-dev] What's with the rename?

P.S. Actually "viewer-dev" might be even better. Kakurady (Geneko Nemeth) 2010/2/5 Kakurady Drakenar > I don't like the name "opensource-dev". The old name, SLDev, fits just well > - it was about people getting together developing Second Life-related stuff. > Now what are we developing? "Open S

Re: [opensource-dev] What's with the rename?

> 2010/2/5 Kakurady Drakenar >> >> I don't like the name "opensource-dev". The old name, SLDev, fits just >> well - i Yes, but Linden Research owns "SL". ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSour

Re: [opensource-dev] What's with the rename?

if I'm not mistaken, this is hosted on a secondlife.com domain, correct? what's the difference? On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 13:21, Maggie Leber (sl: Maggie Darwin) < mag...@matrisync.com> wrote: > > 2010/2/5 Kakurady Drakenar > >> > >> I don't like the name "opensource-dev". The old name, SLDev, fit

[opensource-dev] quicktime failed??

hello is there is anyone why my build fail to start after it compiled? i get this 'secondlife-bin.exe': Loaded 'C:\Program Files (x86)\QuickTime\QTSystem\QuickTimeCapture.qtx' The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0x1998) has exited with code 0 (0x0). The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0x112c) has exited with code

Re: [opensource-dev] quicktime failed??

code 0 means no fail. Check the log file. Mike Andrew Simpson wrote: > hello is there is anyone why my build fail to start after it compiled? > > > i get this > 'secondlife-bin.exe': Loaded 'C:\Program Files > (x86)\QuickTime\QTSystem\QuickTimeCapture.qtx' > The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0x1998)

Re: [opensource-dev] Ohai!

It is basically the SLDev list, just with a new name. - Nexii On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:35 PM, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote: > I don't recall signing up for this list, but I'm happy to be here.  If > nobody else takes credit, I'll blame robla. > > I haven't done anything with SL in a while... busy wit

[opensource-dev] Client-side prediction

Re-send. Didn't realize the new list was up already. Heya, > I written a quick article about a theoretical implementation that I had been > baffling on about for a while now. > > > http://www.avatarsunited.com/avatars/nexii/apps/blogs?view-params={"section":"show","id":"2442"}

Re: [opensource-dev] [sldev] Build tools improvements in Viewer 2.0?

Yup that was about the in-world build tools all right. Nothing about compiling it. Kakurady (Geneko Nemeth) 2010/2/5 Colin Kern > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Paul Oppenheim (Poppy Linden) > wrote: > > It's still CMake, if that's what you're asking. I'm not on the viewer 2 > team, so I can'

Re: [opensource-dev] Ohai!

Welcome back all of you :) - Merov ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] Snowglobe 1.3 RC1

Hi, With the landing of a patch for SNOW-196 (mutex locking) that was causing freezes, hangs and crashes, we created new binaries for 1.3, aptly named RC 1. We're still unsure about that fix though so please, download, use, test and report bugs in PJIRA when finding them (don't forget screen shot

[opensource-dev] (no subject)

___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

Re: [opensource-dev] Ohai!

> Welcome back all of you :) It's alive, IT'S ALIVE! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8H3dFh6GA-A ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unm

Re: [opensource-dev] Client-side prediction

I'm not sure about this -- I tried this with a free-flight parabola and got a nonsense value out. Calculations attached at the end. What is the significance of the "anchor"? It looks like you're trying to estimate the center of the path's curvature? If you were doing that, you want to intersect

Re: [opensource-dev] Client-side prediction

If you apply 6-sigma calculations to the expected future and the actual future as reported when the position changes, you can begin to build a predictor that has a high degree of precision and is based off quantifiable history. Using the predictor as a an input, you can fine tune the expect

Re: [opensource-dev] Ohai!

New car smell. It's nice. (Stealth test post - checking archiving & bad attachment stripping) On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: > Welcome back all of you :) > - Merov ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available her

Re: [opensource-dev] Client-side prediction

Ah, thanks Celierra. 3 planes, yes that makes a lot more sense. Hmm, trying to step through your calculations. I think you have to subtract the angle difference rather than add it on. I just tried visually going through your calcs and it seems to hit right on your perfect value p3. http://i48.tin

Re: [opensource-dev] The new name.

"opensource-dev" We support the new name, it's logical & clear. Nice work, DMC Jurassic/Zsigmond Science Fiction -Original Message- From: opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com [mailto:opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of Soft Linden Sent: Saturday, February 0

Re: [opensource-dev] Client-side prediction

I made a small mistake at the "current angle" (it should be -0.2ish radians instead of -pi/4), which makes the angle difference close to a semicircle. But still, if you add that, you end up with a vector pointing up and backwards... (If you subtract, you end up just heading back left...) Maybe I'