Hi,
Thanks Robin for the summary of the Hippo discussion. It's consistent with
Q's schema and the point of the discussion was to avoid Merov becoming the
bottleneck for merges in Snowglobe trunk...
Another thing we said this week was that the export (from viewer-public to
viewer-external, process
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden)
wrote:
> The merge to Snowglobe isn't automatic -- it probably requires intelligent
> merging. So if that includes leaving things out, so be it. The right way to
> do it will probably be to undo the changesets so that it doesn't become a
> f
On Mar 22, 2010, at 12:58 AM, Latif Khalifa wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden)
> wrote:
>> Hi, all. I've created a draft of our repository strategy for how we will be
>> handling open development branches at LL, and posted an annotated diagram on
>> the wiki.
>>
At this point, our internal branches still contain proprietary libraries and
parts of our server code. We have to have an explicit export process to block
that. We have a team working on "source code splitup" to finish the separation
of our systems into libraries, and when that's finished I beli
On Mar 22, 2010, at 9:11 AM, Boroondas Gupte wrote:
> Hi Q
>
> thanks for illustrating the planned process.
>
> On 03/22/2010 04:38 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote:
>>
>> Since it's policy we intend to follow, please edit only for clarity. If it
>> needs substantive tweaking, please let us do
Hi Q
thanks for illustrating the planned process.
On 03/22/2010 04:38 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote:
> Since it's policy we intend to follow, please edit only for clarity. If it
> needs substantive tweaking, please let us do it.
>
As not everyone who might find that wiki article will be rea
*confused* I thought that we were going to use hg, so that
commits made internally can be easilly and frequently
pushed to a public repository. Is that "viewer-public"?
Then why is there is there still a "viewer-external"
using SVN? That kinda defeats the purpose of hg?
I thought, and think, that
For a first shot it looks fine. I hope thou in the furture snow-glow
will hang in hg directly from the viewer-public the. Svn branches
between will only make extra work not really needed. But no need to
stress that extra work. A project like snowglow is the most gaining on
a distributed cm
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 4:38 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden)
wrote:
> Hi, all. I've created a draft of our repository strategy for how we will be
> handling open development branches at LL, and posted an annotated diagram on
> the wiki.
>
> https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Linden_Lab_Repositor
