Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-23 Thread Opensource Obscure
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:12:14 -0300, Tigro Spottystripes wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > How about Google Wave? (i'm not for nor against it, that was a completly > unbiased question) And/or IRC relay. New thread on tools? opensource obscure ___

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-23 Thread Tigro Spottystripes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 How about Google Wave? (i'm not for nor against it, that was a completly unbiased question) On 23/3/2010 11:12, Aleric Inglewood wrote: > Having the IW meetings always at the same time and the same day of the week > locks some people out. > > Me for

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-23 Thread Philippe (Merov) Bossut
Hi, On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Aleric Inglewood < aleric.inglew...@gmail.com> wrote: > Having the IW meetings always at the same time and the same day of the week > locks some people out. > > Me for example. I can never attend on Thursdays. I'd really appreciate it > if it was possible to h

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-23 Thread Aleric Inglewood
Having the IW meetings always at the same time and the same day of the week locks some people out. Me for example. I can never attend on Thursdays. I'd really appreciate it if it was possible to have the meetings regularly on another day of the week. Maybe every two weeks on thursdays and every tw

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-23 Thread Argent Stonecutter
On 2010-03-23, at 00:12, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: > - Forum: there is actually one for Open Source > (https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/forums/open-source > ). I know that some folks at LL prefers this at it allows to create > topics and sub threads more easily. I went there today an

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-23 Thread Robin Cornelius
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote: > Hi, > > Each tool has its pluses and minuses and we use a variety of them: > - IW meetings: we have our weekly Hippo meeting and I truly encourage folks > to come. It's my favorite comm tool personally as it's a dedicated moment > a

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-22 Thread Philippe (Merov) Bossut
Hi, Each tool has its pluses and minuses and we use a variety of them: - Mailing list: may be the most widely used tool. The problem I see with it is that it mixes everything: small requests, long discussions, policies, technicalities, etc... Other FLOSS projects use a variety of lists, breaking t

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-18 Thread Jonathan Irvin
Yeah more or less the lists are discussion-oriented for the most part. When I think of JIRA, I think of more serious items to be presented to the business for more guided discussions and DoesThisPatchReallyMakeSense tests. I also agree with Carlo, JIRA is for facts not opinions...but JIRA has tur

Re: [opensource-dev] Request for clarification on mailing list guidelines

2010-03-18 Thread Carlo Wood
Imho, the jira should be used for technical facts regarding a bug only, and not for opinions. General feedback is better discussed on this list. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 08:38:53AM -0500, Sheet Spotter wrote: > If a topic generates more than five replies in less than 24 hours, it's time > to > red