Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

On 2010-08-23, at 13:18, Yoz Grahame wrote: > As Josh and others have said, one of the things we'd need is a unique secret > account identifier. Unfortunately the only existing account datum which might > work here is email address, and that's not unique, though we're starting to > think that it

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

And a further note: Be sure to handle the "+" (plus) character in emails. Gmail (and possibly other systems) allows you to concatenate a + and some character string to the account name portion of the email address. This would allow me to have myemail+a...@gmail.com, etc. allowing me to only need a

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

Am Monday 23 August 2010 schrieb Yoz Grahame: > On 23 August 2010 11:51, Joel Foner wrote: > > As Josh and others have said, one of the things we'd need is a > > unique > > > >> secret account identifier. Unfortunately the only existing > >> account datum which might work here is email address

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

On 23 August 2010 11:51, Joel Foner wrote: > As Josh and others have said, one of the things we'd need is a unique >> secret account identifier. Unfortunately the only existing account datum >> which might work here is email address, and that's not unique, though we're >> starting to think that

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s)

On 24/08/2010 4:51 AM, Joel Foner wrote: As Josh and others have said, one of the things we'd need is a unique secret account identifier. Unfortunately the only existing account datum which might work here is email address, and that's not unique, though we're starting to think

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

> > As Josh and others have said, one of the things we'd need is a unique > secret account identifier. Unfortunately the only existing account datum > which might work here is email address, and that's not unique, though we're > starting to think that it really should be > Just a quick note... ema

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

On 23 August 2010 02:32, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > You'd win :-) > SVC-6212 (which also includes > the 1:many relationship between (1) and (2) Argent suggests below) > > As I commented in that issue, this is something we at the Lab would dearly love to

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s)

On 2010-08-23 12:35, Joshua Bell wrote: On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Boroondas Gupte mailto:slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch>> wrote: But even without that, a 'master account' would make a lot of things easier, like one could account verify all Alts at once, see billings for all lin

Re: [opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > > But even without that, a 'master account' would make a lot of things > easier, like one could account verify all Alts at once, see billings for all > linked agents centrally etc. > No argument from me! But as with the other suggestion:

[opensource-dev] separation between login id and publicly visible id(s) (was: display names = the end of 1.x viewers?)

On 08/23/2010 05:53 AM, Joshua Bell wrote: >> Ideally, IMHO, there would be at least three "names": >> >> (1) login identifier (used with password as login credential) >> (2) unique human readable identifier >> (3) casual conversational identifier >> >> Prior to "Display Names", the Second Life (f