On 2011-01-08 12:58, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> am I the only one who thinks that
> https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SH-489 should be rated a bit higher
> than "minor, will be fixed in the distant future"?
If any open developer is interested in taking on this (and/or the
similar-soun
I'm not sure it is a separate problem, or related, but I've been able
to see people's voice dots for extreme distances (whenever they are
>1px,) through any number of intervening prims. Even if the nametag
is obscured, the voice dot comes through. Has given me quite the
advantage in "hide-and-see
Am Sonntag, 9. Januar 2011 schrieb Robert Martin:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Ponzu wrote:
> > Can someone give a cheap estimate of how hard this will be to
> > fix? if it is easy to fix, I agree that it should be done soon.
>
> i would say that a full audit of the hover text submodule wo
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Ponzu wrote:
> Can someone give a cheap estimate of how hard this will be to fix?
> if it is easy to fix, I agree that it should be done soon.
i would say that a full audit of the hover text submodule would be in
order (say 4 hours of junior grade programmer??)
Can someone give a cheap estimate of how hard this will be to fix?
if it is easy to fix, I agree that it should be done soon.
Is there a cost/benefit analysis done when Sprints are prioritized?
ponzu
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Lance Corrimal
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> am I the only one who t
Hi there,
am I the only one who thinks that
https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SH-489 should be rated a bit higher
than "minor, will be fixed in the distant future"?
bye,
LC
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secon
