>
> I've heard DATA_ONLINE will now only work for "the owner or the creator" of
> the script. Shouldn't that be instead "owner or compiler" of the script? Any
> full permission script already written could be used and recoded as a status
> finder, and I have a feeling this will be what people m
100% agreed!
From: adeonwri...@live.com
To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:21:04 -0500
Subject: [opensource-dev] data_online's new requirements
I've heard DATA_ONLINE will now only work for "the owner or the creator" of the
script. Shoul
I've heard DATA_ONLINE will now only work for "the owner or the creator" of the
script. Shouldn't that be instead "owner or compiler" of the script? Any full
permission script already written could be used and recoded as a status finder,
and I have a feeling this will be what people move to for
