For group lists and IM floaters, I'd personally prefer a name sort as primary,
as any time I'm ever actually looking at the list, I'm looking for a specific
individual. But in the group list, I can see the value of online status first,
then by name (to see who's on)
On Jun 5, 2011, at 9:43 AM
M
> To: OpenSource Mailing List
> Subject: [opensource-dev] Sorting table displays
>
> When you open up the information for a group and get the list of
> members, their role title, and their last active date none of those
> columns are sorted by default. Should one be and if so, wh
When you open up the information for a group and get the list of
members, their role title, and their last active date none of those
columns are sorted by default. Should one be and if so, which one?
Are there other tables like this that you can think of which would
benefit from being sorted (wit
