On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 4:47 PM, Jacek Antonelli
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Carlo Wood wrote:
> > Actually, I think I understand why.
> >
> > LL is using hg internally, and has been for a while.
> > They just pushed things out as svn for public access, but that process
> > caused a
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Carlo Wood wrote:
> Actually, I think I understand why.
>
> LL is using hg internally, and has been for a while.
> They just pushed things out as svn for public access, but that process
> caused all the meta data to be lost and had to be done manually, and
> theref
Actually, I think I understand why.
LL is using hg internally, and has been for a while.
They just pushed things out as svn for public access, but that process
caused all the meta data to be lost and had to be done manually, and
therefore only sometimes in big large chunks.
It is for the benefit
Doesn't hg use diff3 in the end, to do the merges?
Every repository does.
The difference between CVS and subversion was that CVS applies
diff3 on the source files, and therefore couldn't deal with
renaming files at all. Subversion has the provision of remembering
file renaming separately, so it c
For one, http://hgbook.red-bean.com/
Bryan O'Sullivan has worked at LL, so there is the obvious uptake there
with his work on hg.
Yes, the greater community has used git, yet the main point is we need
to expire svn in order to help maintain merges easier and in a more
distributed fashion. LL u
Cool intro!
Here is a rosetta stone to add, for those use to git to help understand hg:
http://wiki.sympy.org/wiki/Git_hg_rosetta_stone#Rosetta_Stone
Brent Tubbs wrote:
> Yes hg (mercurial) is distributed. �It also thinks in terms of
> "changesets" rather than "versions".
>
> Joel Spolsky of t
Then why Hg over Git?
Ron Festa
Virtual Worlds Admin
Division of Continuing Studies at Rutgers University
PGP key: http://bit.ly/b1ZyhY
Phone: 732-474-8583
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jonathan Irvin wrote:
> If I'm not mistaken, Hg is distributed like Git.
>
> Jonathan Irvin
>
>
>
> On Fri
Yes hg (mercurial) is distributed. It also thinks in terms of "changesets"
rather than "versions".
Joel Spolsky of the Joel on Software blog just did a very nice intro and
tutorial on Mercurial that you can read at http:///hginit.com . The first
section in particular highlights the differences b
If I'm not mistaken, Hg is distributed like Git.
Jonathan Irvin
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 05:12, Carlo Wood wrote:
> What is the advantage again of hg (over svn)? (why the move)
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:18:54PM -0700, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> >
What is the advantage again of hg (over svn)? (why the move)
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 05:18:54PM -0700, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
>It would
> be the wrong impression, further, to assume the same committers will
> take on the extra load to
Latif Khalifa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> At the Open Source meet today, it appears we have a light at the end of
>> To help quicken the merges and to save the history of them, we need
>> volunteers on to help with the hg repository. The snowglob
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
[snip]
> At the Open Source meet today, it appears we have a light at the end of
> To help quicken the merges and to save the history of them, we need
> volunteers on to help with the hg repository. The snowglobe-1.x branches
> can migrate over
At the Open Source meet today, it appears we have a light at the end of
the tunnel for the SVN repository, so we need volunteers, eventually, to
help manage the hg repository.
Here is the hg site for linden lab: http://bitbucket.org/lindenlab/
To help clarify the movement, the oss-viewer branch
13 matches
Mail list logo
