On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 AM, JB Hancroft wrote:
e thought the v.w. systems would be morphing over the next 2-5 years.
>
> A co-operative P2P network of users who would be willing to opt into
> "participate in cache sharing"
> would be a good idea. Having the cache be fairly intelligent - bro
I was just sketching this up yesterday, in a brainstorming session with some
folks about how
we thought the v.w. systems would be morphing over the next 2-5 years.
A co-operative P2P network of users who would be willing to opt into
"participate in cache sharing"
would be a good idea. Having the
On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 17:14:01 -0400
Ponzu wrote:
> I have also thought a bit about the situation where two or more users
> are on the same subnet. Think of a dozens of people in the same LAN
> in a meeting, for example.
>
> Current system has each user building an almost identical cache
> locall
I have also thought a bit about the situation where two or more users
are on the same subnet. Think of a dozens of people in the same LAN
in a meeting, for example.
Current system has each user building an almost identical cache locally.
Instead, what if all the users went through a proxy, and t
