Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Viewer cache size increase to 10GB.

On 6/6/2011 11:00 PM, Tateru Nino wrote: > Not that I'm not glad to see the maximum cache size increased, but the > cache cap was only very reluctantly increased to 1GB as the performance > of the system increasingly suffered as the quantity of cached objects > increased. > > How did we solve this?

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Viewer cache size increase to 10GB.

Not that I'm not glad to see the maximum cache size increased, but the cache cap was only very reluctantly increased to 1GB as the performance of the system increasingly suffered as the quantity of cached objects increased. How did we solve this? On 4/06/2011 9:32 PM, Oz Linden wrote: > This is a

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Viewer cache size increase to 10GB.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/318/#review719 --- Ship it! - Oz On June 3, 2011, 12:56 p.m., Log Linden wrote: >

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Viewer cache size increase to 10GB.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/318/#review718 --- indra/newview/llfloaterpreference.cpp

[opensource-dev] Review Request: Viewer cache size increase to 10GB.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/318/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- This patch increases the maximu