> On Dec. 1, 2012, 4 p.m., Nicky Perian wrote:
> > https://bitbucket.org/log_linden/viewer-storm-1854/commits/cf7ad502c7c3/
> > does not match this diff. result should be &result
Got fixed in
https://bitbucket.org/log_linden/viewer-storm-1854/commits/b418be80903520c492e1173f3afbc4021cad5d07
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/#review1286
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Boroondas Gupte
On Nov. 30, 2012, 5:17 p.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/#review1284
---
Ship it!
Compiled linux 32 and 64 bit with the updated freetype
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/#review1282
---
https://bitbucket.org/log_linden/viewer-storm-1854/commits/cf7ad5
> On Dec. 1, 2012, 3:47 p.m., Tankmaster Finesmith wrote:
> > Ship It!
the approach in this diff is the same NickyD used in firestorm. WE haven't had
issues with it so far
- Tankmaster
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To
> On Dec. 1, 2012, 9:30 a.m., Nicky Perian wrote:
> > Kokua's approach was to updated the libs and deliver them using
> > viewer_manifest.py.
> > Using the updated libs/includes I get the following compiler error.
> > It appears when the libs are LL updated this mod will need to be backed out.
>
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/#review1278
---
Kokua's approach was to updated the libs and deliver them using
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/
---
Review request for Viewer.
Description
---
This is a fix for STORM-185