Re: [opensource-dev] Rebuilding Breakpad

2012-11-11 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 11.11.2012 19:17, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > Shouldn't builds be based on build rules, and not on tweaks in the > application? Chances are these tweaks aren't in the cmake binary but in build rules which are part of the CMake distribution. As these tweaks probably compensate for differences be

Re: [opensource-dev] Rebuilding Breakpad

2012-11-11 Thread Argent Stonecutter
Shouldn't builds be based on build rules, and not on tweaks in the application? On 2012-11-11, at 12:06, Nicky Perian wrote: > I saw some message list traffic on the cmake list about the newer cmake > versions having some lion behavior tweaks. > http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake that

Re: [opensource-dev] Rebuilding Breakpad

2012-11-11 Thread Nicky Perian
he details.   > > From: Tonya Souther >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com >Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2012 11:55 AM >Subject: [opensource-dev] Rebuilding Breakpad > >I need to rebuild Breakpad for OS X to make the dump_syms command >64-bit

[opensource-dev] Rebuilding Breakpad

2012-11-11 Thread Tonya Souther
I need to rebuild Breakpad for OS X to make the dump_syms command 64-bit, because Firestorm has gotten too big for the 32-bit version. (The rest of you may run into this before very long.) I'm trying to use the 3p-google-breakpad repository, forked into https://bitbucket.org/tonyasouther/3p-google