It's pretty much what the first draft should have looked like. Can't
imagine what interfered with the process to get it in the state it was
originally.
On 25/04/2010 8:58 PM, Nexii Malthus wrote:
> Definitely much more acceptable now.
>
> Thanks Joe
>
> - Nexii
>
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM,
Definitely much more acceptable now.
Thanks Joe
- Nexii
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 2:01 PM, Thickbrick Sleaford <
thickbrick.sleaf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 20 April 2010 17:02:26 Joe Linden wrote:
> > Boy,
> >
> > There was nothing quiet, or "in the background" about it, believe me.
> Th
On Tuesday 20 April 2010 17:02:26 Joe Linden wrote:
> Boy,
>
> There was nothing quiet, or "in the background" about it, believe me. This
> update is the topic of conversation at the noon PDT brown bag I'm hosting
> today. The changes were pushed live ahead of the meeting, so there would
> be n
On 04/20/2010 03:41 PM, Jonathan Irvin wrote:
"4. You assume all risks, expenses, and defects of any Third-Party
Viewers that you use. Linden Lab shall not be responsible or liable
for any Third-Party Viewers."
That sure sounds like what you all have been wanting. The risk is on
the user, no
"4. You assume all risks, expenses, and defects of any Third-Party Viewers
that you use. Linden Lab shall not be responsible or liable for any
Third-Party Viewers."
That sure sounds like what you all have been wanting. The risk is on the
user, not so much the developer.
Jonathan Irvin
Cell: +1-3
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Joe Linden wrote:
> Boy,
>
> There was nothing quiet, or "in the background" about it, believe me. This
> update is the topic of conversation at the noon PDT brown bag I'm hosting
> today. The changes were pushed live ahead of the meeting, so there would be
> no
There have been numerous times since the new TOS came out that i've
wanted to go inworld and have refused to do so for fear of liability
under this policy. Thank you for fixing it, now I might be able to
play with the new plugins API without fear.
With those changes, this is a policy that personal
, April 20, 2010 10:02 PM
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Quiet amendments of TPV (again)
Boy,
There was nothing quiet, or "in the background" about it, believe me. This
update is the topic of conversation at the noon PDT brown bag I'm hosting
today. The changes were pushed li
Agreed, this is a major improvement.
Thanks, Joe.
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Latif Khalifa wrote:
> I second that Gigs, very positive changes indeed.
>
> My thanks to Joe for making this happen.
>
> Latif
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Gigs wrote:
> > These look like positive cha
I second that Gigs, very positive changes indeed.
My thanks to Joe for making this happen.
Latif
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Gigs wrote:
> These look like positive changes that address some of the concerns.
>
> Thank you for your efforts Joe.
>
> Joe Linden wrote:
>> Boy,
>>
>> There was
These look like positive changes that address some of the concerns.
Thank you for your efforts Joe.
Joe Linden wrote:
> Boy,
>
> There was nothing quiet, or "in the background" about it, believe me.
> This update is the topic of conversation at the noon PDT brown bag I'm
> hosting today. The
Boy,
There was nothing quiet, or "in the background" about it, believe me. This
update is the topic of conversation at the noon PDT brown bag I'm hosting
today. The changes were pushed live ahead of the meeting, so there would be
no question they are incorporated in to the TPV and TOS, both of w
Interesting changes, worthy of some thoughtful consideration. Have to
run this one back past the lawyers and see what they say.
On 20/04/2010 11:45 PM, Boy Lane wrote:
> As this did not make it into the mailing list yet but is rather important,
> LL changed the TPV policy again, quiet, in the back
As this did not make it into the mailing list yet but is rather important,
LL changed the TPV policy again, quiet, in the background.
I don't know how this affects the legal validity of that document
people agreed by clickwrapping since the new ToS popup, I just
want to make you aware of that.
R
14 matches
Mail list logo
