Re: [opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() function in 1.38.0

2010-03-08 Thread Lear Cale
It's generally a bad idea to change behavior dramatically, and much safer to add a new function. Dramatic changes in behavior cause new bugs, or cause old but insignificant bugs to become significant. New functions don't. On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Obsidian Kindragon wrote: > Hi all, > >

Re: [opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() function in 1.38.0

2010-03-07 Thread Soft Linden
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 6:58 AM, Michael Schlenker wrote: > > Am 07.03.2010 um 15:39 schrieb Obsidian Kindragon: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've a quick question regarding the new llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() >> function in 1.38.0. Why did LL opt for a new function instead of just >> removing the delay fr

Re: [opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast()function in 1.38.0

2010-03-07 Thread Marine Kelley
pile the script(s) >> >> GCI >> >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Obsidian Kindragon" >> To: >> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:39 PM >> Subject: [opensource-dev] Question regarding >> llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast()function

Re: [opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast()function in 1.38.0

2010-03-07 Thread JB Hancroft
ragon" > To: > Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:39 PM > Subject: [opensource-dev] Question regarding > llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast()function in 1.38.0 > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've a quick question regarding the new llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() >

Re: [opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast()function in 1.38.0

2010-03-07 Thread Garmin Kawaguichi
[opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast()function in 1.38.0 > Hi all, > > I've a quick question regarding the new llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() > function in 1.38.0. Why did LL opt for a new function instead of just > removing the delay from the current

Re: [opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() function in 1.38.0

2010-03-07 Thread Argent Stonecutter
On 2010-03-07, at 08:39, Obsidian Kindragon wrote: > I've a quick question regarding the new llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() > function in 1.38.0. Why did LL opt for a new function instead of just > removing the delay from the current llSetLinkPrimitiveParams() > function? Because code that curren

Re: [opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() function in 1.38.0

2010-03-07 Thread Michael Schlenker
Am 07.03.2010 um 15:39 schrieb Obsidian Kindragon: > Hi all, > > I've a quick question regarding the new llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() > function in 1.38.0. Why did LL opt for a new function instead of just > removing the delay from the current llSetLinkPrimitiveParams() function? > I can't c

[opensource-dev] Question regarding llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() function in 1.38.0

2010-03-07 Thread Obsidian Kindragon
Hi all, I've a quick question regarding the new llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast() function in 1.38.0. Why did LL opt for a new function instead of just removing the delay from the current llSetLinkPrimitiveParams() function? I can't conceive any case where removing the delay from the current funct