On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM, JB Hancroft wrote:
> I'm concerned that there are so many divergent viewer projects, that the
> end-user experience is going to be fractured.
> What happens when I want "this shiny new thing" (available only with the ABC
> viewer), and "that other shiny" (availabl
Aleric Inglewood wrote:
> It would be totally not-done to then take my code and release it under
> a non-GPL license, most specifically, to release binaries without the
> ability for users to get the source code. That is why I got so upset
To be clear, Linden Lab does still plan to do this. There
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Dzonatas Sol wrote:
> Ambroff Linden wrote:
> > I don't know if this is true or not, but regardless, copyright
> > assignment helps Linden enforce the GPL, which is good for everyone.
> > That's why the FSF was also used as an example.
> >
> > -Ambroff
>
That is
Hi JB,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 8:42 AM, JB Hancroft wrote:
> Can you amplify on this? "We are going to start moving more of our Viewer
> development into the open."
>
> Which parts of the viewer, specifically?
>
What Howard meant is that, all of the viewer development will happen in the
open,
Ambroff Linden wrote:
>
> I don't know if this is true or not, but regardless, copyright
> assignment helps Linden enforce the GPL, which is good for everyone.
> That's why the FSF was also used as an example.
>
> -Ambroff
Yes, a simple copyright assignment would be easier then a Contributor
Ag
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Gareth Nelson wrote:
> > - If you are going to contribute to Snowglobe, you will need to complete
> > the Second Life Viewer Contribution Agreement. While not everyone is
> > comfortable with it, we need to do it to protect our business interests.
> It
> > also pro
> - If you are going to contribute to Snowglobe, you will need to complete
> the Second Life Viewer Contribution Agreement. While not everyone is
> comfortable with it, we need to do it to protect our business interests. It
> also protects you. I'll draft off of Sun's FAQ and this FSF page on the
>
:opensource-dev-boun...@lists.secondlife.com] On Behalf Of JB
Hancroft
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2010 10:43 AM
To: Howard Look
Cc: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] Moving forward with open development
Howard,
Can you amplify on this? "We are going to star
Howard,
Can you amplify on this? "We are going to start moving more of our Viewer
development into the open."
Which parts of the viewer, specifically?
Here's why I'm asking:
I'm concerned that there are so many divergent viewer projects, that the
end-user experience is going to be fractured.
Wh
Hey opensource-dev@,
Well, no lack of passion here recently. I want to let you know that we're
paying very close attention and we're prepared to make some changes to how we
manage our open development projects and work with the community.
First, our intent:
- We are going to start moving more
10 matches
Mail list logo
