On 10/11/2010 12:44 PM, Robert Martin wrote:
> 3 "WorkingOnIt Linden"* should only have an issue assigned for maybe
> two weeks since a lot of times WorkingOnIt Linden means BlowingItOff
> Linden is actually NOT working on it.
Workingonit Linden should have never been created. "Working on it"
s
Thanks Q
>reopening because you don't like a decision is a waste of everyone's time, and
will result in temporary or permanent loss of JIRA access.
Sounds good to me.
On 10/11/10 7:44 AM, "Kent Quirk (Q Linden)" wrote:
> So we've modified the JIRA system again to allow residents to reopen issue
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden)
wrote:
> If the reason is that we can't use the issue the way it's written, then
> please don't reopen it, write a new and better one.
Just make sure on the Linden side we have a few things laid out
1 if a linden closes a jira then there sh
;
>
> > Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:00:24 -0700
> > From: br...@slearth.com
> > To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> > Subject: [opensource-dev] Jira Issue Resolution Issue
> >
> > As a user I would like to be able to reopen Jira issues wrongly closed by
>
th.com
> To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
> Subject: [opensource-dev] Jira Issue Resolution Issue
>
> As a user I would like to be able to reopen Jira issues wrongly closed by
> ignorant people who can't read, creating havok. Like this one there:
>
> Stone Tremont added
As a user I would like to be able to reopen Jira issues wrongly closed by
ignorant people who can't read, creating havok. Like this one there:
Stone Tremont added a comment - 08/Oct/10 2:17 AM
This is not a bug because you do not pay prims, avatars are payed via whole
objects. This should be a fea
