-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/10/2012 10:31 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> "File JIRAs for any issues you find ..."
>
> If it's not a request for feedback, then I don't know what it is..
>
> Granted, I didn't file a JIRA, but since the patch was posted
> here...
^Yeah, that.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:21:03 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 3:26 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:29:43 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> >>>
On 11/02/2012 3:26 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:29:43 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote:
>
>> On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
>>> On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>>>
Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very l
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:29:43 +1100, Tateru Nino wrote:
> On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> >
> >> Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late date.
> > LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?..
On 10/02/2012 6:14 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>
>> Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late date.
> LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for
> feedback if everything is already
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 20:14:10 +0100
Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>
> > Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late
> > date.
>
> LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for
> feedback if ev
On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:11:30 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> Henri, that protocol is not subject to change at this very late date.
LOL !... You are kidding me, right ?... What's the use to ask for
feedback if everything is already settled ?... That got to be a
(very bad) joke !!!
Henr
On 2012-02-09 13:55 , Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Sorry for my late reply, but I have been busy backporting multiple
> clothing layers to the Cool VL Viewer this last couple of weeks
> (released today in Cool VL Viewer v1.26.3.4)...
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:13:31 -0800, Jenn Leech wrot
Greetings,
Sorry for my late reply, but I have been busy backporting multiple
clothing layers to the Cool VL Viewer this last couple of weeks
(released today in Cool VL Viewer v1.26.3.4)...
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012 11:13:31 -0800, Jenn Leech wrote:
> I should add that we are also testing inventory rou
I should add that we are also testing inventory routing changes on those
sims on aditi as well. Items which are *newly* sent to your inventory
should show up in the Received Items folder (e.g. someone gives you an
item, you purchase an item etc. - these will show up in this new system
folder).
We
On 2012-01-28 14:13 , Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:57:20 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the delay letting you know - the inventory service on Aditi is
>> running the version this is needed for, so if you want to test a port,
>> do it there.
> The feature
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 16:57:20 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> Sorry for the delay letting you know - the inventory service on Aditi is
> running the version this is needed for, so if you want to test a port,
> do it there.
The feature also depends on a sim capability, and as far as I
On 2012-01-06 16:15 , Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly
ordered. With the new backend, tha
Am Wednesday 11 January 2012 10:07:55 schrieb Henri Beauchamp:
> Oops...
>
> There was a bug in the patch I sent for v1 viewers (I forgot to replace
> mFolderAdded(FALSE) with mFolderAdded(folder_added) in the constructor
> of LLInventoryCopyAndWearObserver).
>
> Attached to this email is the fixed
Oops...
There was a bug in the patch I sent for v1 viewers (I forgot to replace
mFolderAdded(FALSE) with mFolderAdded(folder_added) in the constructor
of LLInventoryCopyAndWearObserver).
Attached to this email is the fixed patch.
Henri.
slviewer-v1-copy_and_wear_v2.patch
Description: Binary da
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 23:41:17 + (GMT), Hitomi Tiponi wrote:
>
>> Will a patch be provided for Viewer 1,
>
> Here is a patch that should apply to v1 viewers (you may perhaps get
> rejects due to spacing changes, but they should be dead eas
On Sat, 7 Jan 2012 23:41:17 + (GMT), Hitomi Tiponi wrote:
> Will a patch be provided for Viewer 1,
Here is a patch that should apply to v1 viewers (you may perhaps get
rejects due to spacing changes, but they should be dead easy to work
around).
Note that by lack of any testing ground, I cou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/7/2012 3:41 PM, Hitomi Tiponi wrote:
> Will a patch be provided for Viewer 1
No. But which ever V1 TPV gets around to porting it first can provide
it to the others to save them time.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
Scott Lawrence)"
>Subject: [opensource-dev] Inventory Patch you should integrate
>To: opensource-dev
>Message-ID: <4f07648e.7050...@lindenlab.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>We're going to deploying changes to the inventory back
My bad.
note to self, do not merge patches when sleepy.
> usr/src/packages/BUILD/dolphinviewer3-
> beta/indra/newview/llinventorymodel.cpp:463:8: error: prototype for
> 'LLUUID LLInventoryModel::createNewCategory(const LLUUID&,
> LLFolderType::EType, const std::string&)' does not match any in
> c
Am Freitag, 6. Januar 2012 schrieb Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence):
> We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
> improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
> found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly
> ordered. With the new b
On 2012-01-06 17:25, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:15:58 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>
>> We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
>> improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
>> found that existing viewers relied o
If you do not have this patch there is a 50% chance that when you open
a box with an outfit and pick Copy and Wear not all items will be
worn. (If I have gotten these facts wrong please correct me Oz).
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Henri Beauchamp wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:15:58 -0500, Oz
On Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:15:58 -0500, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
> We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
> improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
> found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly
> ordered. Wit
We're going to deploying changes to the inventory backend soon that
improve robustness and performance, but in testing those changes we
found that existing viewers relied on certain things being strictly
ordered. With the new backend, that assumption does not always hold true.
Changeset d327d
25 matches
Mail list logo
