Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Gareth Nelson
I think gigs meant it's not a ruling in the sense of something legally binding like a court ruling would be, it's not even really legal advice. Anyway, the current amended policy seems much more reasonable and i'd think the FSF would agree. On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Robert Martin wrote: >

Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Robert Martin
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Gigs wrote: > Ron Festa wrote: >> Not really. If you're a user basically that means you have to stop using >> that viewer if you want to continue access. If you are a developer it >> means you have to remove the ability to connect to SL. Again as per the >> FSF rul

Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Gigs
Ron Festa wrote: > Not really. If you're a user basically that means you have to stop using > that viewer if you want to continue access. If you are a developer it > means you have to remove the ability to connect to SL. Again as per the > FSF ruling on this, they're restricting the service not

Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Ron Festa
I just noticed that the email licens...@fsf.org is being replied to. Guys please remove that email address from your ReplyToAll list to avoid spamming the FSF. Ron Festa Virtual Worlds Admin Division of Continuing Studies at Rutgers University PGP key: http://bit.ly/b1ZyhY Phone: 732-474-8583 On

Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Tayra Dagostino
On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 15:51:04 -0400 Gigs wrote: > I don't think Brett fully considered the implications of: > > "You acknowledge and agree that we may require you to stop using or > distributing a Third-Party Viewer for accessing Second Life if we > determine that there is a violation." > > Wh

Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Ron Festa
As Joe explained in the brown bag currently going on at the time of this writing, you'd be required to end distributing the version that connects to SL. In other words you will be required to remove support for SL. Ron Festa Virtual Worlds Admin Division of Continuing Studies at Rutgers University

Re: [opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Gigs
I don't think Brett fully considered the implications of: "You acknowledge and agree that we may require you to stop using or distributing a Third-Party Viewer for accessing Second Life if we determine that there is a violation." Which is clearly in conflict with the GPL. Ron Festa wrote: > Si

[opensource-dev] Fwd: [gnu.org #566095] Possible Licensing Conflict

2010-04-20 Thread Ron Festa
Since people wanted to see it here it is right from the Free Software Foundation. Ron Festa Virtual Worlds Admin Division of Continuing Studies at Rutgers University PGP key: http://bit.ly/b1ZyhY Phone: 732-474-8583 -- Forwarded message -- From: Brett Smith via RT Date: Tue, Apr