Per the new release process, I don't think there will be any more.
http://community.secondlife.com/t5/Tools-and-Technology/A-New-Process-for-Viewer-Releases/ba-p/1990547
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 8:33 PM, Tammy Nowotny wrote:
> Are there going to be more versions of the Second Life Development
> V
Are there going to be more versions of the Second Life Development
Viewer? It recently became harder to find on the wiki website, and the
latest version I can find is Second Life version 3.5.2.274789, dated
April 25, 2013.
___
Policies and (un)subscri
>
> From: Tyler McMaster
>To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>Sent: Thursday, May 3, 2012 8:39 PM
>Subject: [opensource-dev] Development
>
>I was kinda hoping to make a feature myself, Let me clarify, I want to make a
>TPV. I just need to learn how to
Your first step is to compile the viewer -- have you gotten that far?
Longer term you will need to compile and package it for installation
on all 3 OS platforms.
There are many places you have to alter things to your "brand". One
subtle item is the mutex the viewer uses to prevent multiple copie
Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2012, 18:39:04 schrieb Tyler McMaster:
> I was kinda hoping to make a feature myself, Let me clarify, I want to make
> a TPV. I just need to learn how to code for the viewer. Its complicated
> code and hard to understand at times.
Hi,
a good way to "learn to make a feature"
I was kinda hoping to make a feature myself, Let me clarify, I want to make a
TPV. I just need to learn how to code for the viewer. Its complicated code and
hard to understand at times.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://w
I'm new to the viewer code and have been reading it for awhile now. Can anyone tell me where to look that will tell me how to make a feature or get one started for the viewer? I checked out the viewer-release code just so everyone knows which code i'm working off of.Thanks in advance.
_
On 2010-11-23 22:55, Trilo Byte wrote:
> I notice the version change in the latest snapshot. I sincerely hope that
> means that a 2.4 beta hasn't been committed to before Name Tags has been
> fixed and tested. Shipping a beta/release (that is, putting it on the
> downloads page for all residen
I notice the version change in the latest snapshot. I sincerely hope that
means that a 2.4 beta hasn't been committed to before Name Tags has been fixed
and tested. Shipping a beta/release (that is, putting it on the downloads page
for all residents to easily see/use) with known major & showst
