Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Argent Stonecutter
On 2013-02-09, at 15:40, Cinder Roxley wrote: > Here's a better fix than the other one I posted earlier… Don't use > extern "C". That... shouldn't work, unless it's generating C++ code in lex/yacc/bison/whatever. ___ Policies and (un)subscribe informa

Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Cinder Roxley
er linux distributions" that would depend on >>> BOTH >>> open-164 and bug-1610 and possibly others. >>> >>> >>> besides, I found two more build breakages on openSUSE 12.3 by now... >>> One might be fixable by just adding the right

Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Cinder Roxley
at tackled now. cheers, LC Am Samstag, 9. Februar 2013, 02:34:09 schrieb Nicky Perian: https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/kokua-3.4.4/commits/22012aa8388a38fb657113 b0 db3 effcfdaa3a8d9 ____ From: Lance Corrimal To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Sent: Saturday,

Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Lance Corrimal
gt; LC > > > > > > > > > > From: Lance Corrimal > > > > > >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com > > >Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 5:00 AM > > >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development sourc

Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Lance Corrimal
requirement tho. cheers, LC > > > > > > > From: Lance Corrimal > > > >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com > >Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 5:00 AM > >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source

Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Nicky Perian
Would you mark BUG-1610 as a duplicate of OPEN-164? > > From: Lance Corrimal >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com >Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 5:00 AM >Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not >bui

Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Lance Corrimal
113b0db3 > effcfdaa3a8d9 > > > > > > From: Lance Corrimal > > > >To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com > >Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 4:13 AM > >Subject: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source doe

Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Nicky Perian
ent development source does not build >with glibc 2.17 > >hi, > >does anyone have anything for me about fixing up the source to build with >glibc 2.17? I'm getting ready for openSUSE 12.3 here, and that uses the newer >glibc... >

[opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not build with glibc 2.17

2013-02-09 Thread Lance Corrimal
hi, does anyone have anything for me about fixing up the source to build with glibc 2.17? I'm getting ready for openSUSE 12.3 here, and that uses the newer glibc... for details, see BUG-1610 cheers, LC ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information ava