Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-23 Thread leliel
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Altair Sythos wrote: > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:19:24 -0700 > leliel wrote: > > >> >> > the other (imho better) way to select right march/mtune is use >> > "generic" and declare *all* parameters, sort of: >> >> This is the proper fix imho. >> >> > for 32bit: >> > gc

Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-23 Thread Sythos
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:19:24 -0700 leliel wrote: > > > the other (imho better) way to select right march/mtune is use > > "generic" and declare *all* parameters, sort of: > > This is the proper fix imho. > > > for 32bit: > > gcc -march=generic -mtune=generic -m32 -mmmx -msse -msse2 > > -mfpma

Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-23 Thread leliel
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 3:08 AM, Altair Sythos wrote: > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:08:26 +0200 > Boroondas Gupte wrote: > >>  Because SSE2 is now required anyway, -march=pentium4 is now passed >> for building lindenlab/mesh-development. Of course, this doesn't work >> for 64bit builds. (See CTS-315 >

Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-23 Thread Sythos
On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 03:08:26 +0200 Boroondas Gupte wrote: > Because SSE2 is now required anyway, -march=pentium4 is now passed > for building lindenlab/mesh-development. Of course, this doesn't work > for 64bit builds. (See CTS-315 > .) What should mar

Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-23 Thread Boroondas Gupte
On 10/23/2010 03:23 AM, Carlo Wood wrote: > Why is SSE2 required now? Sorry if I missed this. Ah, sorry, should have linked to Runitai's comment on CTS-284

Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-22 Thread leliel
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > Because SSE2 is now required anyway, -march=pentium4 is now passed for > building lindenlab/mesh-development. Of course, this doesn't work for 64bit > builds. (See CTS-315.) What should march be set to for 64bit buids, if > anything? It sh

Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-22 Thread Marc Adored
I assume that they probably used some SSE2 optimizations for the mesh code On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Carlo Wood wrote: > Why is SSE2 required now? Sorry if I missed this. > > On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 03:08:26AM +0200, Boroondas Gupte wrote: >> Because SSE2 is now required anyway, -march=pen

Re: [opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-22 Thread Carlo Wood
Why is SSE2 required now? Sorry if I missed this. On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 03:08:26AM +0200, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > Because SSE2 is now required anyway, -march=pentium4 is now passed for > building > lindenlab/mesh-development. Of course, this doesn't work for 64bit builds. > (See > CTS-315.) W

[opensource-dev] (CTS-315) march choice for 64bit builds

2010-10-22 Thread Boroondas Gupte
Because SSE2 is now required anyway, -march=pentium4 is now passed for building lindenlab/mesh-development. Of course, this doesn't work for 64bit builds. (See CTS-315 .) What should march be set to for 64bit buids, if anything? Cheers, Boroondas __