Re: [opensource-dev] Display names, again.

2010-08-23 Thread Will
Oz, what is Linden Labs position on Emerald and will they be making a public announcement? (not a lawyer just a concerned resident, remember them?) From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 1:28 PM To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: Re: [opensource-dev

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Will
;>/ verified. > />>/ > />>/ I hope that the upper echelons of Linden Lab are not fooled by the > />>/ blog post and instead demand that more action be taken. At the bare > />>/ minimum, they need to be delisted until real

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Will
the Third-Party Viewer shall terminate automatically." To me it sounds like any viewer not on the list is not approved and that means by their own statement it will not be allowed to connect. -- From: "Gareth Nelson" Sent: Sunday, Aug

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Will
hmm ok I may be wrong but remember a rush to update viewers from the approved list, didn't look over my shoulder and just for good housekeeping I don't venture from approved viewers. Seriously hope you are wrong or there will be little to no control over who gets

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Will
using it > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Lance Corrimal > wrote: >> Am Sunday 22 August 2010 schrieb L. Christopher Bird: >>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Jesse Barnett >> wrote: >>> > Ignoring this and giving the all clear with no other action

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Will
Found this morning, forgive me for not noting where, but it puts it in context: Anonymous said... Why did they do that? Well, you may recall that Emerald (more specifically the libemkdu library in it) was caught leaking personally-identifiable information about its users in an encrypted form tha

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

2010-08-17 Thread Will
"It is absolutely not going to happen, and any suggestion to that effect will be ignored." So much for "It's your world your imagination" This has been apparent for some time now. Thanks for being 100% clear and now I think we have found the issue that keeps LL fi

Re: [opensource-dev] Snowstorm Daily Scrum Summary - 08/16/2010

2010-08-16 Thread Will
No amount of rationalizing will make acceptable a bad implementation of a design feature- it's better to accept there are serious design flaws and address it quickly. Will From: Esbee Linden (Sarah Hutchinson) Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 10:15 PM To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlif