The SVN server was hosted at SoftLayer, and that server (rather, the
address) has been taken over by someone else, that's all. Just needs to
be removed from the dns pool.
On 17/05/2011 10:20, Jonathan Welch wrote:
> Someone on IRC just pointed out that the old source url,
> http://svn.secondlife
~T
On 18/10/2010 18:13, Dale Innis wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Thomas Grimshaw
> wrote:
>> Imprudence is certainly not stable enough for a viewer targeted at
>> builders.
>>
>> ~Tom
> Imprudence is no less stable than any other viewer (TP or LL
Imprudence is certainly not stable enough for a viewer targeted at
builders.
~Tom
On 18/10/2010 15:26, Jamey Fletcher wrote:
> Marc Adored wrote:
>
>> Yes that could be awesome like The Fermi Builders Mod for Phoenix or
> Imprudence?
> ___
> Policies
On 01/10/2010 18:04, Ponzu wrote:
> Nobody has crappier internet than I (satellite).
Well, we're really talking about transfer caps, here, rather than
available bandwidth.
Available bandwidth can be appeased by the network slider. But transfer
caps are the biggest problem, and pretty much ev
On 01/10/2010 09:54, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> did you ever notice how may people are online in SL only at the
> beginning of
> the month? ...yes, that's because their connection gets capped after a few
> days of SL
> usage... because SL kicks up even more traffic than downloading pirated music
>
Loading 1mb of content per user is hardly a denial of service attack.
Crosslinking occurs everywhere on the web, this is simply nothing but
paranoid bull.
I'm not a big fan of the Emerald team either, they're arrogant,
two-faced, cast themselves as elitists, and censor comments on their
webs
This was always going to happen, and it will continue to happen. Of
course in this case, the "proxy" counts
as the third party viewer really, and is in violation of the TPV. Not
that violating the TPV really matters.
Tom.
Dale Glass wrote:
> Today I heard that there's already a proxy available
This post is likely to incur some feelings of emotions in a lot of you;
I ask that you bear with me and be open minded towards these words. I
recognise that many of you won't agree with me; it is but an attempt to
try and shine a searchlight into the hysteria.
*The Stark Truth*
Firstly, a remi
It's also been implemented completely and is live on the Meta7 grid.
~T
Rob Nelson wrote:
> Sigh.
>
> I've tackled this in my viewer with a plugin, and yet no one seems
> interested in the plugin system I'm using; Everyone's hellbent on
> binary plugins. Feel free to use the code, I haven't a
It's the truth. Snowglobe is unstable.
~Tom
Armin Weatherwax wrote:
>> I am simply pointing out that they are NOT compatible with the GPL.
>>
> GPL compatible or not - the sentence "The Snowglobe Viewer [...] this
> viewer may be somewhat less stable than the official Second Life
> viewer"
10 matches
Mail list logo
