Am 11.09.2010 um 17:31 schrieb Zi Ree:
> Am Samstag 11 September 2010 17:22:33 schrieb dilly dobbs:
>
>> it more like a game with a limited number of opening/learning the interface
>> 'quests' so to speak. There has to be some way to keep all of the sign
>> ups.
>
> The old orientation islands
Am 19.08.2010 um 21:30 schrieb Daniel Smith:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Michael Schlenker
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> How about a display option in the viewer that can 'highlight' the fact that
>> your display name is the same as your username
>&g
Am 19.08.2010 um 11:51 schrieb Argent Stonecutter:
>
> On 2010-08-18, at 13:19, Michael Schlenker wrote:
>>> Can you elaborate on what kind of RP would require you to be able to set
>>> your display name to "Argent Stonecutter"
>
>> Sure. Anywh
Am 18.08.2010 um 15:05 schrieb Argent:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Michael Schlenker
> wrote:
> Am 18.08.2010 um 01:16 schrieb Bryon Ruxton:
> > And 2. you should also prevent anyone to use a display name baring the name
> > of an existing username in my opinion.
Am 18.08.2010 um 01:16 schrieb Bryon Ruxton:
> Sorry if lacked clarification,
> I was referring to the "current" residents names (as capitalized), NOT the
> new display name which will become the person's username as I understand it.
>
> Because of the added flexibility with Display Names, I see
Am 17.03.2010 um 00:29 schrieb Zi Ree:
> Am Mittwoch 17 März 2010 00:21:42 schrieb Glen Canaday:
>
>> Most of the people I have known in SL shop, go to clubs, create, RP, and
>> hang out, most of which requires chatting without an extra step to
>> switch focus. Leaving the chat bar with focus ki
Am 09.03.2010 um 23:57 schrieb Michael Schlenker:
>
> Am 09.03.2010 um 02:54 schrieb Lear Cale:
>
>> huh? Can you point to existing technology for this analyzer? Seems
>> to me like it would require an oracle.
For an example of such a technique for
than that it should work pretty well.
Michael
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Michael Schlenker
> wrote:
>>
>> Am 08.03.2010 um 18:46 schrieb Kelly Linden:
>>
>>> We are not out to write a new malloc for mono. What we have is a system
>>> that th
Am 08.03.2010 um 18:46 schrieb Kelly Linden:
> We are not out to write a new malloc for mono. What we have is a system that
> throws an exception when the memory used by the script hits a certain
> threshold (64k currently). This exception is caught so we can "crash" the
> script. The futur
Am 07.03.2010 um 15:39 schrieb Obsidian Kindragon:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a quick question regarding the new llSetLinkPimitiveParamsFast()
> function in 1.38.0. Why did LL opt for a new function instead of just
> removing the delay from the current llSetLinkPrimitiveParams() function?
> I can't c
Am 06.03.2010 um 21:25 schrieb Marine Kelley:
> Does that mean we have to modify ALL our scripts to add function calls to
> tailor the memory right, most of the time not even knowing how much is needed
> ? I thought the memory taken by Mono scripts was variable, to a maximum of
> 64k, as oppos
Am 24.02.2010 um 09:51 schrieb Lance Corrimal:
> Am Mittwoch, 24. Februar 2010 09:26:12 schrieb Thomas Shikami:
>> Philippe (Merov) Bossut schrieb:
>>> - SOCKS5: here, Robin volunteered
>>
>> SOCKS5 is against the TPV Policy term
>> 2c. You must not circumvent any security-related features or m
12 matches
Mail list logo
