Re: [opensource-dev] New Release Viewer 3.4.0 being partially blocked by popular antivirus-software AVAST

2012-09-14 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:47 AM, Martin Fürholz wrote: > The latest release viewer 3.4.0 from > http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s3.amazonaws.com/hg/repo/viewer-release/rev/264700/arch/CYGWIN/installer/Second_Life_3-4-0-264700_Setup.exe > is being partially blocked by the popular antivirus-s

[opensource-dev] Linux64 "boost 1.39" is still actually boost 1.34.1

2011-02-14 Thread Aidan Thornton
Hi, It looks like the packaged linux64 version of boost, http://s3.amazonaws.com/viewer-source-downloads/install_pkgs/boost-1.39.0-linux64-20100119.tar.bz2, is still actually the mislabelled boost 1.34.1. Is there a newer build available? Thanks, Aidan

Re: [opensource-dev] Convexdecomposition for open source devs

2010-12-30 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:03 PM, WolfPup Lowenhar wrote: > Bullet Physics Library(just the convexdecomp section): > > Web site : http://code.google.com/p/bullet/ > > John Ratcliff's: > > Web Site : > http://codesuppository.blogspot.com/2009/11/convex-decomposition-library-now.html I seem to recal

Re: [opensource-dev] Linux 64bit and gstreamer

2010-12-13 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 12/12/10, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > You know what would really help people get over the hump of setting up for > building SL? > > A VMware appliance containing a working SL build environment, for 32 and 64 > bit Linux. It's sort of vaguely on my TODO list, possibly including a way of creatin

Re: [opensource-dev] Linux 64bit and gstreamer

2010-12-12 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 12/12/10, Marc Adored wrote: > Awesome I will checkout the latest then and try to compile it. I > wasn't aware it was even close to working. I'm excited now. It's actually been possible for a while, but until recently you had to manually dig up patches from the Wiki in order to compile a 64-bi

Re: [opensource-dev] LGPL violation

2010-10-28 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 10/28/10, Erik Anderson wrote: > There is a static component that is linked when linking to dynamic > libraries, however that is present mostly to inform the compiler on what the > ABI is, or how your compiled code is expected to interact with the DLL. It > is very possible to write a piece of

Re: [opensource-dev] Mesh Source Code ETA

2010-10-22 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 10/22/10, Zabb65 wrote: > Looks like this does not need an answer now. Code is up. > http://hg.secondlife.com/mesh-development/ > \o/ Oh, lovely: /** * @filellphysicsshapebuilder.cpp * @brief Generic system to convert LL(Physics)VolumeParams to physics shapes * @author

Re: [opensource-dev] Mesh Source Code ETA

2010-10-22 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 10/22/10, Zabb65 wrote: > Looks like this does not need an answer now. Code is up. > http://hg.secondlife.com/mesh-development/ > \o/ Looks like convex decomposition support has been pulled. "LLConvexDecomposition is a proprietary library based on Havok (TM) physics libraries. In its place, Li

Re: [opensource-dev] O.O Display name code DROP!

2010-10-15 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 7:15 AM, Jamey Fletcher wrote: > Is there actually a *reason* for this change, or is it just to screw > around in the code to do provide an opportunity for new bugs, such as > the one you found already? I suspect the reason for the change is that with display names, the na

Re: [opensource-dev] 2.0 Absolute Dealbreaker - script count feature request

2010-10-04 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Kelly Linden wrote: > Unfortunately no. LSL scripts take up 16k of memory no matter how much they > actually use. Is there any technical reason why this can't be made adjustable, though? I know that changing the amount of script memory available for LSL scripts wou

Re: [opensource-dev] Openjpeg/KDU the cold hard metrics

2010-09-21 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 9/21/10, Robin Cornelius wrote: > I'm still not 100% sure why the build of openjpeg supplied by imprudence > is better than my builds on 2005. Imprudence is using the openjpeg SVN trunk version from a few months ago, which is essentially a pre-release version of openjpeg 1.4 and is slightly mo

Re: [opensource-dev] User Story: Improved Cache

2010-09-19 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 9/19/10, Argent Stonecutter wrote: > Perhaps Tateru was referring to the prim data changing (eg, geometry) while > the prim UUID stays the same. I don't think the viewer makes any assumptions > about prims being unchanged from session to session, so that's not something > that would need to be

Re: [opensource-dev] The Plan for Snowglobe

2010-09-09 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 9/8/10, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > * Remove viewer-external from hg.secondlife.com Am I right in thinking there's no revision history in here that isn't available in more useful and fine-grained form in viewer-external? > * Take down the Snowglobe subversion repositor

Re: [opensource-dev] Display Names open source

2010-09-05 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Henri Beauchamp wrote: > Any chance to get a single diff between the base sources of the viewer > version that was used to implement display names, and the fully display-names > implemented viewer sources ?... Or to get a hold on the sources for the viewer > on whic

Re: [opensource-dev] This is how Linden Lab treats it's customers...

2010-08-28 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Meadhbh Hamrick wrote: > but for reasons i never learned, linden never implemented prim > restrictions for openspace sims. so even though you were only supposed > to have some small number of prims in an openspace sim, the system let > you go over that limit. so gu

Re: [opensource-dev] Removal of the "MultipleAttachments" debug settings ?

2010-08-26 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Altair Sythos wrote: > On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 21:45:14 +0200 > Marine Kelley wrote: > > >> I for one would very much like to see the MultipleAttachments debug >> setting come back and stay ! > > i use multiple attachments, quite all users (but not emerald neither > i

Re: [opensource-dev] Encrypted chat & third-party servers

2010-08-25 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 8/25/10, Brian McGroarty wrote: > Has anyone spent time looking at the encrypted chat feature included in some > third-party viewers? It's my understanding that this contacts third-party > servers in obtaining and validating keys. Is that correct? If so, do these > connections share any informa

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 1:22 PM, Ann Otoole wrote: > What I think LL should consider is something in the TPV policy that > prohibits any tpv from connecting to any non LL server for any reason when a > LL grid is selected for login. This simple policy, if correctly followed, > would have prevented

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-22 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 8/22/10, Phox wrote: > The website in question suffered no ill effects, and to imply that > loading a .php and a few images is an attempt at DDOS is just > ridiculous, our login page consists of a .php script a hi-res picture, > and our website doesn't go down as a result. Your website did go

Re: [opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-21 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Thomas Grimshaw wrote: > Loading 1mb of content per user is hardly a denial of service attack. > Crosslinking occurs everywhere on the web, this is simply nothing but > paranoid bull. This isn't normal crosslinking. The images and content loaded weren't actually

[opensource-dev] Malicious payloads in third-party viewers: is the policy worth anything?

2010-08-21 Thread Aidan Thornton
You may recall that the Emerald viewer has been leaking potentially privacy-infringing information - specifically, the directory to which it's been installed, which in some cases includes usernames - in encrypted form in baked textures. You may also recall that the developers lied and said the issu

Re: [opensource-dev] display names = the end of 1.x viewers?

2010-08-19 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 8/19/10, Kelly Linden wrote: > I just wanted to point out that this theoretical new user's username would > be baloo198731, it would not be baloo198731.resident. The 'Resident' isn't > really a part of a new user's identity. It is only shown to viewers that do > not support display names and le

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

2010-08-18 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 8/18/10, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > While there were some good things about the v1 implementation of pie > menus, they also had some flaws - such as not opening a submenu centered > on the mouse click. I actually puzzled over this a bit when I first realised that Second Life's pie men

Re: [opensource-dev] Open Viewer Development Announcement

2010-08-17 Thread Aidan Thornton
On 8/16/10, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > Think about it for a minute - there are an infinite number of possible > solutions for how to build a UI for a virtual world viewer - what are > the odds that the first or second attempt produced the best possible > UI? We need new and creative idea

Re: [opensource-dev] Mesh rendering: What does indicesp provide?

2010-06-03 Thread Aidan Thornton
Hi, On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 12:35 AM, Rob Nelson wrote: > I am working on the rendering code in the SL viewer at the moment, > having completed the server-side code and some of the client-side > packet-handling classes. However, I have zero familiarity with OpenGL, > so bear with me. > > My viewe

Re: [opensource-dev] Oh, the drama. (was: Viewer blacklist...)

2010-05-09 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Rob Nelson wrote: > As a person who is trying to patch (a now rather old version) of OpenSim > to handle voxel terrain, there's MANY, MANY flaws to the messaging > subsystem of both the viewer and the server. > > For one, I wanted to tack on an additional UDP/TCP

Re: [opensource-dev] Requesting Linden Response: Please move TPVP Topics to a different mailing list

2010-04-17 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Lance Corrimal wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2010 20:49:59 schrieb Joe Linden: > >> **we've had a lot of internal debate around cost/benefit of OS **... and >> we're fully committed to redoubling our commitment to make this a >> successful program*." > > > then..

Re: [opensource-dev] Can you legally agree to incomprehensible conditions

2010-04-08 Thread Aidan Thornton
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Gareth Nelson wrote: > It's a lot of work to maintain, trust me - anyway, it'd be better to > convince the opensim team to allow viewer developers in. Yep - people seem to end up writing their own simulator from scratch instead as a result. I know that I did[1], an