/me takes a quick glance are file revision history.
Oh! Heh. Yes.
One little edit beats five.
On 3/25/2014 10:33 AM, Monty Brandenberg wrote:
> On 3/25/2014 6:58 AM, Ardy Lay wrote:
>> Three files each got a little of this treatment, yes. And I don't
>> expect this to be the right way to do it.
On 3/25/2014 6:58 AM, Ardy Lay wrote:
> Three files each got a little of this treatment, yes. And I don't
> expect this to be the right way to do it. It's just me steering around
> an obstacle that I suspect is caused by something in a make file.
Problem is in FMODEX.cmake. A change I made didn
Three files each got a little of this treatment, yes. And I don't
expect this to be the right way to do it. It's just me steering around
an obstacle that I suspect is caused by something in a make file. I
wanted a viewer with this fmodex fix in it to play with.
On 3/25/2014 4:08 AM, Lance Co
Yes, sorry, I meant viewer-release (it is pretty early in the morning here!)
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting priv
viewer-development, what repository are you talking about? i thought there was
no viewer-development anymore and everything should happen only in viewer-
release?
Anyway I am building from a viewer-release checkout from yesterday which has
the "fixes" you mention.
by the way, https://jira.secon
In the past few days viewer-development just received some fixes for
fmodex -- are you building from the most recent sources?
On 3/25/14, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> that needs to be done in three separate files, right?
>
> done that. I would rather have a fix that doesn't patch the sources b
Hi,
that needs to be done in three separate files, right?
done that. I would rather have a fix that doesn't patch the sources but re-
adds fmodex/ to the include path, but this will do in a pinch.
cheers,
LC
Am Montag 24 März 2014, 20:42:36 schrieb Ardy Lay:
> I worked around it for now:
> -#in
