Re: [opensource-dev] Draft update to the Contribution Agreement

2013-10-08 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
On 2013-10-07 18:50 , Henri Beauchamp wrote: The requested info (snail mail address and private phone number) are simply "excessive in relation for the purpose" (identifying an author: see below). We don't believe that information is excessive for that purpose. You are of course free to disagr

Re: [opensource-dev] Draft update to the Contribution Agreement

2013-10-08 Thread Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)
On 2013-10-07 14:52 , Nicky Perian wrote: The original CLA may have same items and I just did not catch that casual verbal / oral conversations unless prefaced with "this is not a contribution" would be considered a contribution. For me, that puts a chill on discussing with any LL employee the

Re: [opensource-dev] Draft update to the Contribution Agreement

2013-10-08 Thread Gigs
It is customary to include addresses of the parties on contracts in the USA. With only a name and signature, I could always claim it was some other Jason Giglio that agreed to the contract. There aren't many ways to enter a binding contract without risking "outing", since for it to stand up in