On 8/1/2013 12:23 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> - does it still have to be a transparent squid, now that the viewer actually
> has proxy settings?
Sorry, I didn't mean transparent. I have a transparent one at work on
one network for other reasons. Setting the web proxy in viewer is all
that's needed
Am Mittwoch, 31. Juli 2013, 10:56:45 schrieb Kadah:
> a transparent squid proxy, with SL specific cache re-write scripts, makes a
> massive difference
two questions...
- does it still have to be a transparent squid, now that the viewer actually
has proxy settings?
- do you still have those scri
