On 2013-02-09, at 15:40, Cinder Roxley wrote:
> Here's a better fix than the other one I posted earlier… Don't use
> extern "C".
That... shouldn't work, unless it's generating C++ code in
lex/yacc/bison/whatever.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe informa
Here's a better fix than the other one I posted earlier… Don't use
extern "C".
START-
diff --git a/indra/lscript/lscript_compile/indra.l
b/indra/lscript/lscript_compile/indra.l
--- a/indra/lscript/lscript_compile/indra.l
+++ b/indra/lscript/lscript_compile/indra.l
@@ -61
Lance,
I use a workaround on OSX Mountain Lion which fails with the same error,
and it might work for you too. Patch attached and as follows:
START---
# HG changeset patch
# User Cinder Roxley
# Date 1360441583 25200
# Node ID e3673fb4cbfafe3c0
This is where I'm stuck now:
[ 363s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/viewer-development/build-linux-
i686/lscript/lscript_compile/indra.y.hpp:176: error: previous declaration of
'int yyparse()' with 'C++' linkage
[ 363s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/viewer-
development/indra/lscript/lscript_compile
Am Samstag, 9. Februar 2013, 04:41:10 schrieb Nicky Perian:
> Would you mark BUG-1610 as a duplicate of OPEN-164?
definitely not. the problem that I had is because glibc 2.17 brings the
siginfo_t definition by itself... definitely something else.
What I'd think suitable would be a "meta bug" tha
Would you mark BUG-1610 as a duplicate of OPEN-164?
>
> From: Lance Corrimal
>To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 5:00 AM
>Subject: Re: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source does not
>build with glibc 2.17
Thanks... I haven't even gotten that far, my build died way earlier, with a
conflicting declaration for siginfo_t, but I got that tackled now.
cheers,
LC
Am Samstag, 9. Februar 2013, 02:34:09 schrieb Nicky Perian:
> https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/kokua-3.4.4/commits/22012aa8388a38fb657113b0db3
>
https://bitbucket.org/NickyP/kokua-3.4.4/commits/22012aa8388a38fb657113b0db3effcfdaa3a8d9
>
> From: Lance Corrimal
>To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
>Sent: Saturday, February 9, 2013 4:13 AM
>Subject: [opensource-dev] BUG-1610: Current development source
hi,
does anyone have anything for me about fixing up the source to build with
glibc 2.17? I'm getting ready for openSUSE 12.3 here, and that uses the newer
glibc...
for details, see BUG-1610
cheers,
LC
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information ava
