Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Fix for STORM-1854.

2012-12-01 Thread Nicky Perian
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/#review1284 --- Ship it! Compiled linux 32 and 64 bit with the updated freetype

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Fix for STORM-1854.

2012-12-01 Thread Nicky Perian
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/#review1282 --- https://bitbucket.org/log_linden/viewer-storm-1854/commits/cf7ad5

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Fix for STORM-1854.

2012-12-01 Thread Tankmaster Finesmith
> On Dec. 1, 2012, 3:47 p.m., Tankmaster Finesmith wrote: > > Ship It! the approach in this diff is the same NickyD used in firestorm. WE haven't had issues with it so far - Tankmaster --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Fix for STORM-1854.

2012-12-01 Thread Boroondas Gupte
> On Dec. 1, 2012, 9:30 a.m., Nicky Perian wrote: > > Kokua's approach was to updated the libs and deliver them using > > viewer_manifest.py. > > Using the updated libs/includes I get the following compiler error. > > It appears when the libs are LL updated this mod will need to be backed out. >

Re: [opensource-dev] Review Request: Fix for STORM-1854.

2012-12-01 Thread Nicky Perian
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/609/#review1278 --- Kokua's approach was to updated the libs and deliver them using