---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/604/
---
(Updated Nov. 11, 2012, 7:53 p.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
---
On 11.11.2012 19:17, Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> Shouldn't builds be based on build rules, and not on tweaks in the
> application?
Chances are these tweaks aren't in the cmake binary but in build rules
which are part of the CMake distribution. As these tweaks probably
compensate for differences be
Shouldn't builds be based on build rules, and not on tweaks in the application?
On 2012-11-11, at 12:06, Nicky Perian wrote:
> I saw some message list traffic on the cmake list about the newer cmake
> versions having some lion behavior tweaks.
> http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake that
I saw some message list traffic on the cmake list about the newer cmake
versions having some lion behavior tweaks.
http://www.cmake.org/mailman/listinfo/cmake that is the subscribe link, You
should be able to find the archive from there.
I don't have a mac so, I don't kn0w the details.
>__
I need to rebuild Breakpad for OS X to make the dump_syms command
64-bit, because Firestorm has gotten too big for the 32-bit version.
(The rest of you may run into this before very long.)
I'm trying to use the 3p-google-breakpad repository, forked into
https://bitbucket.org/tonyasouther/3p-google
