---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/444/#review992
---
Ship it!
great!
- Richard
On Aug. 25, 2011, 2:23 p.m., Vadim P
On 07/27/2011 01:18 AM, Boroondas Gupte wrote:
> On 07/22/2011 04:02 PM, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote:
>> I'm planning to integrate the changes from
>>
>> https://codereview.secondlife.com/r/167/
>>
>> to better support standalone builds.
>>
>> I've done a test (non-standalone) build in our bui
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/444/
---
(Updated Aug. 25, 2011, 2:23 p.m.)
Review request for Viewer and Richard Ne
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/447/#review991
---
Ship it!
Looks good to me.
- Seth
On Aug. 22, 2011, 8:08 a.m.,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/374/
---
(Updated Aug. 25, 2011, 11:15 a.m.)
Review request for Viewer, Oz Linden, M
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011 10:45:54 +0200, Lance Corrimal wrote:
>
> > Back to browsing the diffs, this time with v3.0 as a reference...
>
> where the *beep* did you find good 3.0 sources? viever-release is
> still 2.8.3, viewer-beta doesn't compile, and viewer-development is
> too volatile for my ta
> Back to browsing the diffs, this time with v3.0 as a reference...
where the *beep* did you find good 3.0 sources? viever-release is
still 2.8.3, viewer-beta doesn't compile, and viewer-development is
too volatile for my taste to base a TPV on...
bye,
LC
