Hi guys,
I produced test binaries for a set of 14 issues so you can give them a spin
and voice concerns before integration. Unfortunately, the TC Windows build
timed out in succession and I didn't get one to build. Here however are the
Linux and Mac ones:
-
http://automated-builds-secondlife-com.s
Erin, you and I have discussed aspects of this several times in the past,
and I'm sure we will again in the future. (I'll comment on the JIRA issue -
thank you for filing it.) However, irrespective of my opinions on the
matter, these issues are related to neither the viewer nor any other open
sourc
> Someone mentioned to me that there is a physics engine upgrade test
> over on the beta grid. I haven't used SL in a while (waiting for mesh
> to be done) so on startup I am notified of the 2.4 beta client at the
> login screen, yeah might as well install that.
Physics is serverside so you should
Someone mentioned to me that there is a physics engine upgrade test
over on the beta grid. I haven't used SL in a while (waiting for mesh
to be done) so on startup I am notified of the 2.4 beta client at the
login screen, yeah might as well install that.
Hmm, odd, I don't think this beta client wo
some of us were using html to cover up the darn twitter and facebook
widgets
security issues: the twitter widget and facebook like button you cant get rid
of.
security issue: if you want your profile visible in SL or at least searchable
it HAS to be open to the entire world... (only get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If its about the possible XSS and html injection, that was fixed today.
All profile text info gets escaped now.
On 1/11/2011 7:47 PM, Simon Quinnell wrote:
> How about you specify the security and privacy issues? No-one here is a
> mind reader.
>
>
How about you specify the security and privacy issues? No-one here is a
mind reader.
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Erin Mallory
wrote:
> because of security and privacy issues with the new profiles can we please
> have option to keep the older ones until someone with the profile team gets
>
On 2011-01-10, at 13:03, Zi Ree wrote:
> Am Montag 10 Januar 2011 17:34:08 schrieb Ponzu:
>
>> What if the upload dialog had a check box?
>>
>>[ ] This texture should have an alpha channel.
>
> Would it be possible to do this on a per-face basis rather than on texture
> upload? So people
because of security and privacy issues with the new profiles can we please have
option to keep the older ones until someone with the profile team gets their
act together?
seriously, these new profiles are creepy.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/32/#review141
---
Ship it!
I haven't built it, but I'm presuming that since you wrot
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/32/
---
(Updated Jan. 11, 2011, 8:27 a.m.)
Review request for Viewer.
Changes
I often take my own custom client for granted. I forget that people can't
select compression levels (ratios are preserved, the textures work for me
and others fine) and a checkbox whether alpha channel should be included.
Additionally asset size statistics for memory usage when uncompressed and
net
I remember looking at the code for the baking process, it looked like it was
made so that the description field could be used to designate what each
channel means by using single char markers.
Thinking this could be the best way to provide extra clues for the client to
use for describing a multi-ch
13 matches
Mail list logo
