Re: [opensource-dev] Message Reception

Bunny, one of the reasons i asked the question is that the "remote" idea here is not real clear. My friend has worked in the same SL club several hours per day, almost every day, since something like early 2007 as club security. The idea is to keep the place PG, among other things, since it gets

Re: [opensource-dev] Message Reception

On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:24 PM, wrote: > Hey, an in-world club employee (security) i have worked with would like to > know if there is some way to be able to pick up local text chat without > moving the avi closer to the chat source, like the way you can cfg the > viewer to hear voice chat from

[opensource-dev] Message Reception

Hey, an in-world club employee (security) i have worked with would like to know if there is some way to be able to pick up local text chat without moving the avi closer to the chat source, like the way you can cfg the viewer to hear voice chat from either where the avi's at or where the camera's at

[opensource-dev] Arrow keys - nm

All, My fault. Wrong checkbox! Please disregard. --GC ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges

[opensource-dev] Arrow Keys Always Move Me

Hey, I'm a little curious - what's the expected behavior of "Arrow Keys Always Move Me"? I was under the impression that this was meant to cause the arrow keys to be the only movement keys, freeing up the rest of the keyboard for chat. I'm wrong, aren't I? --GC

Re: [opensource-dev] STORM-151 : KDU v6.4.1 upgrade update

Hi, We're close to completion here: the compression to j2c is now back on and working apparently (for the few tests I did on Mac and Windows). I'm still thinking about optimization and such but that's good to have a complete basis to work from. I pushed STORM-151 to "Review" and created my first

[opensource-dev] Review Request: Modify Viewer to statically link to KDU v6.4.1 if available

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://codereview.secondlife.com/r/3/ --- Review request for Viewer. Summary --- This rather big patch accomplish

Re: [opensource-dev] Autoupdater Flashback

I have posted this info here: https://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/Viewer_Update_Service/Protocol -Brad On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Kitty wrote: > Would it be possible to get the protocol specification for the updater > service on the server-side? > > > > It’s always possible to work backwards

Re: [opensource-dev] nametag opacity

For me it was confusing because I never use bubble chat. And, it was also confusing because it wasn't exactly self-evident that nametags and bubble chat were so closely related. --Tammy Nowotny On 12/3/10 8:33 AM, Kent Quirk (Q Linden) wrote: This was the subject of some confusion and we're s

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

As of this moment, I don't see a strong consensus either way. It happens that I'm on vacation next week (returning Dec 13th). I'd prefer not to make any final decisions or configuration changes on the last day before I leave (I probably will have little or no Net access while I'm gone), so th

Re: [opensource-dev] POTENTIAL SHOW STOPPER

On 2010-12-02 20:44, WolfPup Lowenhar wrote: Well it could be for OS devs still working with viewer-development if mesh-development get merged to v-d in its current condition. Attached is the outputs from me trying to get mesh-development to build on my system plust the debug outputs for TWO

Re: [opensource-dev] nametag opacity

This was the subject of some confusion and we're still working on it. Please bear with us. Q On Dec 3, 2010, at 6:36 AM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > On 12/03/2010 12:28 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: >> >> Since the recent preferences overhaul (see STORM-31 and in particular >> STORM-573) >

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:52:10 -0500, "Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence)" wrote: > I chose to configure the opensource-dev list as the mailing list, and > the messages do get sent there (as From the user, so the address you > configure for your account needs to match the one you use for the > list, or

Re: [opensource-dev] nametag opacity

On 12/03/2010 12:28 PM, Boroondas Gupte wrote: > Since the recent preferences overhaul (see STORM-31 > and in particular > STORM-573 ) err, STORM-583 , not STORM

Re: [opensource-dev] nametag opacity

On 12/03/2010 05:36 AM, Chuck Baggett wrote: > Are the nametags fixed at 100 per cent opaque or are they of variable > opacity? > > By nametags I mean avatar names and group titles. The opacity is variable, but the control for the setting isn't obvious, as it's labeled "bubble chat opacity", altho

Re: [opensource-dev] ReviewBoard email to this list?

On 2010-12-02, at 07:52, Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) wrote: > This will mean a considerable increase in list traffic, I think, since every > commit to viewer-development should be reviewed. I think that the increase > in transparency of what is happening, and the opportunities for everyone to >

Re: [opensource-dev] nametag opacity

they are now variable. they seem to be tied to the bubble text settings... at least for me Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 22:36:35 -0600 From: chuckbaggett...@gmail.com To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com Subject: [opensource-dev] nametag opacity Are the nametags fixed at 100 per cent opaque o

Re: [opensource-dev] Is there any hope of not having the sidebar cover the bottom bar?

That appears to have been a design decision. Suggest you raise it as an issue if you feel you would like an alternative. I know that while most of my users like the shortened sidebar some still prefer the full-length bar - so it may be better as an option. Hitomi _