May I venture to share these questions:
Regarding the snowstorm sprint2 backlog: I have always tried to observe
other teams using scrum and I have a question regarding negative daily
velocity values. I am not familiar with this and am thinking if this is the
case, then it could mean that burndown g
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Aimee Linden wrote:
> Apparently this option is no longer supported on the server,
If this means you can now create landmarks anywhere, three cheers!
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wik
That looks like https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/SNOW-742 which is fixed in
the viewer-public internal branch (which is where viewer-external on SVN comes
from) and will hopefully be merged into viewer-development soon.
Aimee.
On 20 Aug 2010, at 03:18, Ricky wrote:
> I've pulled rev 11450 (t
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Boroondas Gupte <
slli...@boroon.dasgupta.ch> wrote:
> Does that mean that everyone can create landmarks everywhere or that
> only users with privileges (owner/group role) on the land in question
> can create landmarks? I hope it's the former, which would be consi
Delete only drops it into your Trash folder, so I find that it's not
that big of an issue to "Delete" an object. It's only different from
"Take" in the destination folder!
Your point about removing the entries makes to me.
Ricky
Cron Stardust
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:40 AM, Opensource Obscure
Am Friday 20 August 2010 schrieb Aimee Linden:
> Apparently this option is no longer supported on the server, so it
> was removed from the viewer as it will have no effect.
does that mean that now anyone can create landmarks anywhere no matter
what?
bye,
LC
_
On 08/20/2010 05:26 PM, Aimee Linden wrote:
> Apparently this option is no longer supported on the server, so it was
> removed from the viewer as it will have no effect.
Does that mean that everyone can create landmarks everywhere or that
only users with privileges (owner/group role) on the land i
>> What I would *really* like to see as a builder, and someone with two
>> widescreen monitors, is the ability to drag floaters completely outside
>> the perspective view area
>>
>
> AFAIK, having two monitors is a use case not officially supported by LL/SL
>
Perhaps not, but even with
Apparently this option is no longer supported on the server, so it was removed
from the viewer as it will have no effect.
Aimee.
On 20 Aug 2010, at 15:17, Aimee Linden wrote:
> That's not a Snowglobe issue ... http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-18886
>
> Aimee.
>
> On 20 Aug 2010, at 14:51
That's not a Snowglobe issue ... http://jira.secondlife.com/browse/VWR-18886
Aimee.
On 20 Aug 2010, at 14:51, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Lance Corrimal
> wrote:
> is it just my failing eyesight, or is there no "allow create landmark"
> checkbox
On this subject yes that option is available but if you want to use that
option using the newer viewer you would have to build it yourself while
porting a specific patch to make that functional and also there is another
issue with icesphere concerning using it on windows vista/7.
-Original Mes
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Lance Corrimal
wrote:
> is it just my failing eyesight, or is there no "allow create landmark"
> checkbox in "about land" in 2.1 (snowglobe 2.1.0 r3622) ???
>
>
Darn! We didn't specifically work on that so it has to be the result of a
bogus merge or may be pu
My biggest concern here is that the chat logs (local, group, IM)
register both display and user name as a mandatory part of how chat logs
work. This will forcefully create way to document that so and so was
impersonating someone else and acting in a manner unacceptable to the
real person. I'm n
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:35:18 -0500, Daniel
wrote:
> If the right click drop-down menus are too small a target for people
> to hit, make them larger. Proper font size for reading (ie chat text),
> is not necessarily the right size for a mouse target area. Both should
> scale as a preferences
If the right click drop-down menus are too small a target for people
to hit, make them larger. Proper font size for reading (ie chat text),
is not necessarily the right size for a mouse target area. Both should
scale as a preferences setting. I do like having pie menus as an option.
What I
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Aimee Linden wrote:
> That's because of the LLKDU issue that Merov is currently working to fix.
> You can work around if for now by replacing the llkdu.dll that comes with
> the development viewer with one from the release viewer.
>
Another way to "fix" it i
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 1:38 AM, Lance Corrimal
wrote:
> Is it just me or did the lindens stop replying to this topic?
They probably stopped replying because nearly all of the chatter about
Display Names has been off-topic and inappropriate for this list, and
continuing to discuss it here just fu
I guess I am sure.
Username is unique, you have to request it. No two people will have the
same user name. Sure people can fake it, but no two people will have the
same one at the same time. And it is possible one person will use a name
for a while then someone else will use that name. With al
> That's quite a large font you are using x.X
You're doing it wrong.
WolfPup Lowenhar wrote:
> OOO
My, grandmother! That's such a large font you have!
Stickman
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
htt
That's quite a large font you are using x.X
2010/8/20 WolfPup Lowenhar
> This morning I woke up to check my email to find there was a lot of
> OpenSource email and I thought kewl look like there are some discussions of
> either issues with building the viewer or maybe even about a new fetu
This morning I woke up to check my email to find there was a lot of
OpenSource email and I thought kewl look like there are some discussions of
either issues with building the viewer or maybe even about a new feture
request/porting request, but
OOO
I wake up to find
On Friday 20 August 2010 13:11:04 Argent Stonecutter wrote:
> role-play
the point about display names being great for RPers is failing anyways,
because of the "one change per week" restriction...
how many roleplayers do you know in SL that do not do ANYTHING else, and only
play ONE rp?
bye,
On 2010-08-19, at 21:42, Bryon Ruxton wrote:
> Argent, Keep in mind once the feature is implemented:
> One will be able to choose "Captain America"
> with captain.america becoming his unique username.
> And it wouldn't be fair to prevent anyone else to RP "Captain America" as
> his display name.
S
That's not my job, I am a customer in LL's standpoint, I don't work for
them.
I already talked about possible ways to distinguish a display name from a
user name, for example by putting the display name into brackets in chatlogs
and offline IMs (which are plain text and html respectively), while u
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Marine Kelley wrote:
> damage is done, it is too late. It is CAPITAL that a display name CANNOT be
> mistaken with a user name, no matter how clever the owner of the display
> name is.
You make a good argument.
How about a solution?
Changing color is one. Might
The damage done to the reputation of a well known resident can be
immeasurable. It would be irresponsible of LL to let someone impersonate
someone else without giving any way to let the other people around to see
CLEARLY the difference between a user name and a display name. No amount of
ToS waving
> I am talking about someone creating any random throwaway user account, then
> setting their DISPLAY NAME to "Stickman Ingman", trusting that enough people
> are stupid enough not to look at the real username and compare it with yours.
Yep. I believe this is totally possible for people to do. The
On Friday 20 August 2010 11:00:35 Stickman wrote:
> > ditto, but i have doubts about the "solve all my problems" part
> > unicode. 'nuff said.
>
> Well, periods can't be put into the new usernames (Kelly said so
> earlier). So it's a problem for new accounts where unicode is used to
> cheat th
On 20/08/2010 6:35 PM, Baloo Uriza wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:22:30 +0200, Lance Corrimal wrote:
>
>> On Friday 20 August 2010 08:44:47 Tateru Nino wrote:
>>>Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although,
>>> from the documentation provided by the Lab so far, the ans
On 20/08/2010 6:08 PM, Opensource Obscure wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:44:47 +1000, Tateru Nino
> wrote:
>> Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although,
>> from the documentation provided by the Lab so far, the answer to
>> question one is 'no'.
>
> a few email messages
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:22:30 +0200, Lance Corrimal wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2010 08:44:47 Tateru Nino wrote:
>> Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although,
>> from the documentation provided by the Lab so far, the answer to
>> question one is 'no'.
>
>
> http://en.w
> ditto, but i have doubts about the "solve all my problems" part unicode.
> 'nuff said.
Well, periods can't be put into the new usernames (Kelly said so
earlier). So it's a problem for new accounts where unicode is used to
cheat them. But new accounts can't copy old accounts without a period.
On Friday 20 August 2010 10:37:38 Stickman wrote:
> For me, I'll turn on "show username" in preferences. That'll solve all
> my problems.
ditto, but i have doubts about the "solve all my problems" part unicode.
'nuff said.
> And when someone comes to me after having been swindled,
> I'll t
On 08/20/2010 02:48 AM, Ricky wrote:
> This is starting to sound like it's time for a list:
> [...]
Overall, very reasonable list. (Though I'm not sure users with edit
rights on the object's owner's objects should be the same category as
users having return rights on the land. Aren't there some di
On Friday 20 August 2010 10:31:28 Opensource Obscure wrote:
> I think computer systems exist that are advanced enough to
>
> block such a request ;-) I guess they would work like the
frankly, I am not asking what you think or guess.
this thread was supposed to get a clear and distinct statement
On 8/19/10 9:53 PM, "Baloo Uriza" wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:42:37 -0700, Bryon Ruxton wrote:
>
>> On 8/19/10 7:20 PM, "Argent Stonecutter"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2010-08-19, at 14:09, Michael Schlenker wrote:
Its a special case of the general case, i didn't check but I'm pretty
su
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:48:52 -0700, Ricky wrote:
> Either way, I still see it as of little use with objects I own or am
> the creator of!
>
> As regards the order for objects for which I am neither creator nor
> owner I have no suggestion. The current order might make sense. Then
> again, Do I
>> my "true avatar name" is Lance Corrimal so will there be anything
>> PREVENTING others from using that as theit DISPLAY NAME ???
> LanceCorrimal won't be accepted,
> Lance.Corrimal won't be accepted,
> Opensource.Obscure won't be accepted, etc
Yeah, but he said display name, not username. The
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 10:18:44 +0200, Lance Corrimal
wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2010 10:08:13 Opensource Obscure wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:44:47 +1000, Tateru Nino
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although,
>> > from the documentation provided b
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:08:07 -0400, wrote:
> Seems like twitter has a pretty good solution. Display names are
unique.
> And your login account isn't public so you have better security.
Are you sure? As far as I know, things are quite different:
- login account (that Twitter calls "Username") i
On Friday 20 August 2010 10:08:13 Opensource Obscure wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:44:47 +1000, Tateru Nino
>
> wrote:
> > Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although,
> > from the documentation provided by the Lab so far, the answer to
> > question one is 'no'.
>
> a fe
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:53:18 -0700, Daniel Smith
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Baloo Uriza
wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:15:14 -0700, Daniel Smith wrote:
>>
>> > I'll ask the Lindens a direct question:
>> >
>> > What will you do to prevent others from using my username as their
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 16:44:47 +1000, Tateru Nino
wrote:
> Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although,
> from the documentation provided by the Lab so far, the answer to
> question one is 'no'.
a few email messages ago, Kelly replied to Ann Otoole:
"No new user can crea
On Friday 20 August 2010 08:44:47 Tateru Nino wrote:
> Forwarding your questions through the PR channels, Lance. Although,
> from the documentation provided by the Lab so far, the answer to
> question one is 'no'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aiding_and_abetting ???
> On 20/08/2010 4:38 PM,
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 15:33:25 +1000, Tateru Nino wrote:
> Marvel (back before they had Disney's legion of undead lawyers) sued
> NCsoft over City of Heroes, because the character creator allowed users
> to create avatars that had similar likenesses to or similar names to
> Marvel trademarks. NCsoft
45 matches
Mail list logo
