Re: [opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine

2010-08-05 Thread Dzonatas Sol
Marc Adored wrote: > I'm with you Bunny the last few messages haven't made hardly any sense > at all. I know it has something to do with some card games, MOAP and > apple but what do they all have in common and is it relevant to > opensource-dev? > > For accessibility needs. Actually, we did s

Re: [opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine

2010-08-05 Thread Marc Adored
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Bunny Halberd wrote: > On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > >> As a kid, I loved playing go fish, and then gin, and then gin rummy, and >> rummy, and then rummykub. =) > > Am I accidently filtering part of this list? This is not the first > messag

Re: [opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine

2010-08-05 Thread Bunny Halberd
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Dzonatas Sol wrote: > As a kid, I loved playing go fish, and then gin, and then gin rummy, and > rummy, and then rummykub. =) Am I accidently filtering part of this list? This is not the first message I've gotten that seems completely out of context... - Bunny _

[opensource-dev] V2.X & V1.X support on the same machine

2010-08-05 Thread Dzonatas Sol
I can't keep secrets, so I get blackboxed. It bugs me there are perfect, or almost perfect, programs that just need to be turned around in a way. Too many people are stuck in a paradigm that to even think about it would create a paradox to them. Is that the meaning of paradyme in motion? I thin