Re: [opensource-dev] no autobuilds for snowglobe 1.x anymore?

2010-05-25 Thread Thickbrick Sleaford
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 11:39:11 Lance Corrimal wrote: > Hey, > > is it just me being blind, or are there no automated builds of snowglobe > 1.x anymore? > > > bye, > LC The last build was of r3371, and there were no changes to the 1.x tree since then: https://lists.secondlife.com/pipermail/sld

Re: [opensource-dev] Call for stability patches

2010-05-25 Thread Kent Quirk (Q Linden)
Thanks, Kitty. This is great research. I've forwarded it to some internal people who are looking at it. I've asked them to comment here when we know more. Q On May 25, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Kitty wrote: > I'm not sure if anyone at LL is currently working on (or aware of) this, but > a few o

Re: [opensource-dev] Call for stability patches

2010-05-25 Thread Kitty
I'm not sure if anyone at LL is currently working on (or aware of) this, but a few of the new inventory observers are really degrading the viewer's performance while an inventory fetch is in progress. I narrowed it down to: LLFilteredWearableListManager, LLCOFObserver and LLInventoryCategoriesObse

[opensource-dev] no autobuilds for snowglobe 1.x anymore?

2010-05-25 Thread Lance Corrimal
Hey, is it just me being blind, or are there no automated builds of snowglobe 1.x anymore? bye, LC ___ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to kee